KPBS.org
Support KPBS Election Programming
citizenvoices

Whose Beach Is This Anyway?

View Candace Suerstedt's profile

One of the most contentious debates in Coronado is whether or not the city council has the right to build a permanent lifeguard facility on Coronado beach without voter approval.

Proposition A was initiated by an unincorporated association of property owners and Coronado residents who are asking voters to Vote Yes on Prop A which reads: "Shall the Land Use Plan of the City of Coronado Local Coastal Program be amended to require that prior to the construction or expansion of any permanent lifeguard facilities, restroom facilities, or bike paths on the Coronado Beach the City Council must first receive voter approval?"

Proposition B, initiated by the city, reads: "In the event that Proposition A shall be approved by a majority of the Voters of the City of Coronado, shall the construction of the Lifeguard Public Safety Service Building at Coronado Beach be approved?"

In other words, Prop B is an attempt to construct this particular structure even if Prop A is passed.  Confused?  Of course you are. As with most initiatives it is hard to know how to make sure you are actually voting the way you want to, because the wording is so convoluted, it would be easy to vote against your intended outcome.

The structure in question is a Lifeguard Service Facility/Garage to be built on the sand in the central part of Coronado Beach. While no one would deprive the lifeguards the necessary support they need to perform their duties, the current proposed location is not in the best interests of beach protection and preservation.

In recent days, the Surfrider Foundation spoke out in support of the citizen’s initiative (Yes on A) because it is in accord with their stated mission of protection of water quality, beach preservation, and protecting special places.

As in most small towns, the battle has been personalized with name-calling, ugly letters to the editor, and other polarizing dialogue. This in itself is a tragedy.

Coronado beach

Politics aside, Center Beach in Coronado is the stretch of beach by which I judge every other beach in the world. I was lucky enough to grow up running wild on its silver sands, and as a kid, up before dawn each summer morning, I arrived at the water’s edge by first light. I took pride in getting there before the lifeguards, though I was honor bound to wait until their arrival before I threw myself into surf. Throughout my life I have returned to the very same stretch, sometimes in joy, as when I introduced my baby daughters to the ocean, and other times in grief, using the roar of the waves to mask my cries. These days, as I walk my dogs each evening at dog beach, I watch the sun set behind Point Loma. The last light strafes the patch of green that is Fort Roscrans, where my mother’s ashes and my father’s dog tags lie buried.

This beach is part of my legacy and I for one would like the opportunity to have a vote in how it is treated. It is, after all, a public beach so that means it belongs to all of us.

- Candace Suerstedt is a filmmaker and a mother of three who lives in Coronado.

Comments

While this beach still has time to be supported.. Tomorrow.. February 6th is the crucial day to save SAN ONOFRE STATE BEACH!!!

http://www.surfrider.org/savetrestles/blog/2008/02/its-now-or-never.html

lots of ways to get there.. even help with the parking fee (an age old method of trying to stop public from coming… I mean really.. pay to park to be heard in a democracy??)

there is lots about this on the web.. but strangely little in the news.. link here (http://www.pangeanative.wordpress.com) to hear what CLINT EASTWOOD thinks..

and click here (http://pangeanative.wordpress.com/2008/01/22/arnold-want-to-terminate-san-onofre-state-beach/) to hear what HUEL HOWSER thinks.

Yes.. Coronado needs clean water.. humans need to wake up.. it’s not someone else’s problem.. it’s our problem… the time is now.

Posted on February 05, 2008 at 11:45 am by Dave | Oceanside | http://www.pangeanative.wordpress.com

Well.. I guess the lifeguard was wanted.. I wonder if the confusion made it so the right to vote on future “improvements” was denied..

I had the wording of all that stuff.. it’s totally designed to confuse even the most mentally nimble of us.

When a yes means no.. no yes.. yes yes .. akk!  They should be required to put it on the ballot in simple terms.. and leave the confusion on the pamphlets..

Vote Yes if you want a say in future development.
Vote No if you don’t want this particular lifeguard facility.

Don’t vote either way if you are clueless..

but they don’t say these things.. just some gobbledy gook that the ballot writers design on purpose.. they fight for the wordings they get.. and you can be sure those with money at stake fight hard to make it so their result will pan out..

Posted on February 08, 2008 at 9:53 pm by Dave | Oceanside | http://www.pangeanative.wordpress.com
Page 1 of 1 pages

Submit A Comment

* Required








Remember my personal information
Notify me of follow-up comments
I agree to the KPBS Blog User Agreement and Guidelines