Former pension board members ordered to stand trial
Friday, January 13, 2006
The six former retirement trustees are accused of conflict of interest for voting in 2002 to allow the city to underfund the pension system while receiving a boost in their own benefits.
Prosecutors say there was a quid pro quo. The defendants' lawyers deny any corruption. Judge Frederic Link said there is probable cause to believe a crime was committed. Once the case goes to trial, local attorney Gary Gibson says it will be a tough one for the prosecution to explain to a jury.
Gibson: "You've got to explain how a pension fund works. You have to explain how a benefit package works. You have to explain how those things interrelate. You have to explain the things they were allowed to do and what they weren't allowed to do on this occasion."
Three of the former trustees who have been ordered to stand trial in the state case were indicted last week by a federal grand jury. Amita Sharma, KPBS News.
To view PDF documents, Download Acrobat Reader.
Please stay on topic and be as concise as possible. Leaving a comment means you agree to our Community Discussion Rules. We like civilized discourse. We don't like spam, lying, profanity, harassment or personal attacks.