Texas Latino Leaders Support Voting Rights Act
Tuesday, February 26, 2013
The U.S. Supreme Court will take up a case that could considerably weaken a key part of the Voting Rights Act. Texas civil rights leaders say if that happens, Latino and African-American voters will certainly be discriminated against.
SAN ANTONIO, Texas On Wednesday the U.S. Supreme Court will take up a case that could considerably weaken a key part of the Voting Rights Act. Texas civil rights leaders say if that happens, Latino and African-American voters in the state will certainly be discriminated against.
The case before the nation’s high court, Shelby County v. Holder, is a constitutional challenge to Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act. That prevents states like Texas and Arizona, which have a history of voter discrimination, from changing their voting procedures without proving they won't hurt minorities.
Texas Representative Trey Martinez Fischer says without the Voting Rights Act, Latino voters in Texas would be intentionally discriminated against.
“We have lots of evidence in both the Texas Redistricting case and the voter ID case that will suggest very clearly that's just what could happen without Section 5," Martinez Fischer said.
Under Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott, Texas lost court battles for redistricting and voter identification which the courts found to discriminate against minorities in Texas.
“So when I hear people like [Attorney] General Abbott say Section 5 has outlived it’s purpose, we no longer need Section 5, I think what he’s telling you is that he’s tired of losing under Section 5," Martinez Fischer said.
Abbott has filed a "friend of the court" brief asking the Voting Rights Act to be voided. He says it’s another example of the federal government interfering with the rights of states and it is an unnecessary burden to states.
To view PDF documents, Download Acrobat Reader.
Please stay on topic and be as concise as possible. Leaving a comment means you agree to our Community Discussion Rules. We like civilized discourse. We don't like spam, lying, profanity, harassment or personal attacks.