skip to main content

Listen

Read

Watch

Schedules

Programs

Events

Give

Account

Donation Heart Ribbon

EU-U.S. Trade: A Tale Of Two Farms

Farmer Richard Wilkins, a firm believer in genetically modified crops, examines the corn crop at his farm in Greenwood, Del. U.S. and EU officials begin talks Monday on an ambitious free-trade agreement. Among the stumbling blocks is agriculture. Unlike the U.S., the EU bans the cultivation of genetically modified crops.

Farmer Richard Wilkins, a firm believer in genetically modified crops, examines the corn crop at his farm in Greenwood, Del. U.S. and EU officials begin talks Monday on an ambitious free-trade agreement. One stumbling block is agriculture. Unlike the U.S., the EU bans the cultivation of genetically modified crops.

Most American beef is banned in Europe because most U.S. cattle are raised on genetically modified food. French farmer Michel Baudot has about 500 head of cattle in the Burgundy region and says he believes those rules should remain in place.

Audio

Aired 7/8/13

U.S. and EU officials begin talks Monday on an ambitious free-trade agreement aimed at generating billions of dollars of new trade. But negotiators must overcome barriers created by cultural and philosophical differences over sectors like agriculture. In Europe, the cultivation of genetically modified crops is banned, while in the U.S., they are a central part of food production. NPR's Jackie Northam visited a farm in Delaware and NPR's Eleanor Beardsley visited one in Burgundy, France, to look at those deep-seated differences. We hear from Jackie first.

A ferocious noon sun beats down on Richard Wilkins as he traverses long rows of corn at his farm in Greenwood, Del. The tall, healthy stalks bow slightly to a gentle breeze that does little to ease the heat. He's expecting a relatively good corn yield this year. He first started farming more than 40 years ago. He began planting genetically modified crops -- corn, soybeans, alfalfa -- in the mid-1990s. Since then, Wilkins has become a true believer, he calls them genetically enhanced crops.

"This is an advancement in science that's good for mankind, it's good for the planet," he says. "It's something that myself as a farmer, ecologist, environmentalist, I've embraced it as being a better way for us to grow our food."

A Stumbling Block

Genetically modified crops will be one of many thorny issues taken up when the U.S. and the European Union sit down to negotiate the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership -- or T-TIP -- in Washington this week. The ambitious free-trade deal could form the world's largest single market. It promises to create thousands of new jobs and generate tens of billions of dollars of additional trade.

Negotiators will attempt to reduce tariffs and adapt common standards. Both sides have much to gain. But what will be especially difficult will be overcoming barriers created by cultural and philosophical differences when it comes to sensitive areas like agriculture.

Roughly 90 percent of the soybeans, corn, cotton and sugar beets now grown in the U.S. are genetically modified. Wilkins believes many Americans are used to the idea. But he says Europeans view the benefits and safety of genetically modified crops with deep suspicion. He says there are philosophical differences when it comes to genetically modified crops that will be difficult to overcome in the trade negotiations.

Wilkins say the EU subscribes to the "precautionary principle." He says it wants ironclad assurances that products made from genetically modified organisms -- or GMOs -- won't be harmful in the long term. Wilkins says there's nothing wrong with being cautious.

"But you shouldn't refuse to try something because you don't know, you're worried or scared that even though all the science says that it's safe that science may be wrong," he says.

Wilkins says sometimes using the precautionary principle is an excuse for not giving access to the marketplace.

Sales To Europe

Wilkins, who is a member of the American Soybean Association, says Europe is an important market for American farmers. But he's watched U.S. exports of GMO crops to Europe shrink over the past 15 years. Genetically modified soybean exports dropped 70 percent. The soybean association blames that primarily on anti-GMO activists in Europe and the EU's decision to label food packages as containing GMO products. Wilkins says the soybean association opposes labeling food packages and considers the issue a non-starter in the free-trade negotiations.

"It gives a signal to the less informed purchaser ... the less educated consumer would interpret that as, 'Well, I don't want to eat that; it contains genetically modified organisms,' " he says.

Over the years, the EU has authorized only a few varieties of GMO crops for import. Wilkins says the U.S. wants it to adopt a faster, more streamlined regulatory process for everything from agriculture to automobiles. Analysts say both sides have safety and health in mind, but go about it in a different way.

The View From France

From Eleanor Beardsley:

In a verdant field in the middle of Burgundy, cattle farmer Michel Baudot, a third-generation beef producer, looks out among this stock of cattle. The herd gathers around him as he offers a little treat. Baudot raises about 500 head of cattle -- they're the all-white Charolais breed, known for its high-quality meat.

In the warm months, the animals stay in the fields eating grass. In the winter, Baudot brings them into the barn, where they eat mostly hay and some grains.

That's a completely different system than in the U.S. In the states, the large majority of cattle are raised on giant feedlots, where they're fed GMO grains and given hormones to build bulk quickly. Baudot says this way is cheaper and faster, but it would not work in Europe.

"It's impossible to have the same food in France and Europe because the consumer don't want to eat GMO or hormones. It's forbidden," he says.

Most American beef is banned in Europe. Only a small percentage of what is known as non-hormone-treated cattle is allowed in. American ranchers hope trade negotiations will help ease European restrictions on American beef. But Baudot says he fears competing openly with American cattle farmers because it's not a level playing field. He says the continent's mostly family-owned farms cannot compete with industrial production.

Concerns About A Deal

"I'm worried about open business because [I'm] sure we will not win because it's too different," he says. "If it's open, I think in 10 years, we all disappear in France and Europe. The cost in the U.S. is less than in Europe."

Baudot says the EU has lots of obligations that cost money. One, in particular, is traceablity, where every piece of beef must be traced back to its herd and even the original cow. Baudot says this is a key component of EU farming that is not generally practiced in the U.S.

All of Baudot's cows have names, and each one wears a bar-coded ear tag and has a passport listing its mother and father and where it was born, raised and slaughtered. That's how traceability is ensured.

Beyond the livestock, European farmers hope the trade talks will give them freer entry into the U.S. for their geographic region products - like Italian salamis or French cheeses.

Baudot says centuries-old gastronomic traditions in Europe depend on high-quality agriculture. He says for now European consumers' high standards ensure quality production and the survival of farmers. He fears a day when consumers will look only at the final sticker price of beef. And he believes a giant, free-trade market will bring that day only closer.

Copyright 2013 NPR. To see more, visit www.npr.org.

Comments

Avatar for user 'Peking_Duck_SD'

Peking_Duck_SD | July 8, 2013 at 3:13 p.m. ― 1 year, 4 months ago

I listened to this story on my morning drive, and it was excellent. Thanks to NPR for bringing a balanced look at the differences in food products between Europe and the U.S.

Many people that aren't able to travel likely don't realize how stark the differences are because once on American soil, we are under the propaganda of the giant U.S. food and meat producers who, with billions of dollars and round-the-clock lobbyists have convinced us we have a safe and healthy food system in this country.

The nationalistic ones will likely shun me for saying this, but when it comes to food quality Europe is light years ahead of the U.S., and the U.S. is more similar to an unregulated 3rd world country.

I mean come one, who in their right mind would choose to eat a steak from a cow fed hormones and antibiotics versus a cow fed naturally on grass and grains.

But in the U.S. food industry, profit takes precedence and therefore we see refusal to label GMO products, and a goal of making things as cheaply as possibly with quality suffering.

Yes, there are local organic producers in California who produce superb quality, but the difference between us and Europe is that in Europe the mainstream food supply is one of quality whereas here it's one of crap and the quality has to be sought-out.

If I were the Europeans, I would be appalled at the thought of importing more American food products.

( | suggest removal )

Avatar for user 'CaliforniaDefender'

CaliforniaDefender | July 8, 2013 at 6:30 p.m. ― 1 year, 4 months ago

Anything labeled "Made in USA" gets tossed back on the shelf.

I only buy grain and cheese products imported from Europe and Canada. As Duck said, there are a few Californian non-GMO farms that can match European quality, but they're hard to find.

As for meat, you have to be insane to eat it. Doubly insane to eat meat from the US.

Another reason why universal healthcare is unfair. Why should a healthy person who cares about what they eat have to pay for an unhealthy person who doesn't?

( | suggest removal )

Avatar for user 'Peking_Duck_SD'

Peking_Duck_SD | July 8, 2013 at 9:09 p.m. ― 1 year, 4 months ago

CADef, you had me until your last two sentences!!

( | suggest removal )