skip to main content

Listen

Read

Watch

Schedules

Programs

Events

Give

Account

Donation Heart Ribbon

Asm GOP: Shift Gas Tax Revenues, High-Speed Rail Bonds to Road, Highway Projects

An artist's rendering of the high-speed rail.

California High-Speed Rail Authority

Above: An artist's rendering of the high-speed rail.

The Assembly Republican caucus says billions of dollars in high-speed rail bonds and gas tax revenues would be better spent on infrastructure projects.

4 FAQs About California’s High-Speed Rail Plan

How much will it cost?

The current price tag is listed as $68 billion, but it has fluctuated wildly. California's High-Speed Rail Authority says it is still cheaper than building dozens of new airport runways and highways to accommodate a state population expected to hit 46 million by 2035.

Who is paying for it?

The state agency that oversees the project has nearly $10 billion in voter-approved bonds for rail construction and improvements to existing lines, and $3.2 billion in federal financing for the first 130 miles. But no private investors have stepped forward yet, and it is unclear where the rest of the financing will come from. A court case that could delay the project hinges on the state's funding plan.

Where will it go?

Construction will start in the Central Valley, a 30-mile stretch from Madera to Fresno. In future years, the rail line will stretch westward to San Jose and south to Palmdale and the San Fernando Valley. There are currently no plans to link the train lines to Sacramento or San Diego.

When will it be built?

Shovels will be in the ground "within a few months," rail officials say.

Construction work has been repeatedly delayed, and officials face a deadline to finish the first leg by 2017 or risk losing the federal money. Officials initially said it would start last year, then delayed it to summer 2013 and currently say "within a few months." However, engineering, surveying and excavation work has begun.

The high-speed rail business plan says trains will run between the greater Los Angeles area and the San Francisco Bay Area by 2029.

Source: Associated Press, Oct. 20, 2013.

GOP lawmakers want to take money from several different sources and spend it on road, highway, bridge and port projects. What they don’t want to spend it on is high-speed rail.

“We’re done with that. We’re over that,” says Assembly Republican Leader Connie Conway (R-Tulare), whose proposal would ask voters to scrap high-speed rail and put the money towards infrastructure instead. “The taxpayers are now stuck with a huge bill, the governor’s folks even keep raising up the estimation of what that’s gonna cost, and here we are today and nothing’s been done.”

The proposal would set aside $11 billion in one-time funds – mostly from voter-approved high-speed rail bonds – and $2.4 billion each year in Proposition 42 gas tax revenues. Republicans say their plan would create more than 100,000 jobs.

Gov. Jerry Brown's administration says canceling the high-speed rail project would cost the state $3 billion in federal funds – and cost the Central Valley thousands of jobs.

We've upgraded to a better commenting experience!
Log in with your social profile or create a Disqus account.

Please stay on topic and be as concise as possible. Leaving a comment means you agree to our Community Discussion Rules. We like civilized discourse. We don't like spam, lying, profanity, harassment or personal attacks.

comments powered by Disqus