KPBS has a planned power outage, due to set up of our new backup generator, scheduled for Saturday, May 18th from 10 p.m. to 6 a.m., impacting our live stream, FM and TV.
Stats can be confusing to those who don't understand them....
"I did hear it was broadcast on the news that 80% of Pertussis cases in Washington was of people who were current on all their DTAP and TDAP vaccines....."
So I made a spreadsheet to see how that works out.
Even if vaccines were 90% effective, assuming those who weren't vaccinated had a 40% chance of not contracting Whooping cough when exposed, and assuming an immunization rate of 95%, a whopping 76% of those who contracted the illness would have been current on their vaccinations.
If you drop it down to 80% effective, the percentage of people infected who are vaccinated goes to 86%
The stat hiding in the background is that the percentage of people who were NOT infected who were immunized is 98% and 97%, respectively.
So really, vaccines can be (and are) remarkably effective, and still give you your "80% of the cases were those who are vaccinated" stat.
Anyone who uses a stat like this as an argument against vaccines needs to take Statistical Analysis 101, in my opinion. Just as the CDC said, "statistically, higher vaccination rates increases the probability a sick person will have been immunized."
Is Whooping Cough Vaccine Working?
Stats can be confusing to those who don't understand them....
"I did hear it was broadcast on the news that 80% of Pertussis cases in Washington was of people who were current on all their DTAP and TDAP vaccines....."
So I made a spreadsheet to see how that works out.
Even if vaccines were 90% effective, assuming those who weren't vaccinated had a 40% chance of not contracting Whooping cough when exposed, and assuming an immunization rate of 95%, a whopping 76% of those who contracted the illness would have been current on their vaccinations.
If you drop it down to 80% effective, the percentage of people infected who are vaccinated goes to 86%
The stat hiding in the background is that the percentage of people who were NOT infected who were immunized is 98% and 97%, respectively.
So really, vaccines can be (and are) remarkably effective, and still give you your "80% of the cases were those who are vaccinated" stat.
Anyone who uses a stat like this as an argument against vaccines needs to take Statistical Analysis 101, in my opinion.
Just as the CDC said, "statistically, higher vaccination rates increases the probability a sick person will have been immunized."
May 4, 2012 at 11:50 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )