Jump to content
Last login: Thursday, October 4, 2012
how can water for 7% of the SD population mean a reliable future source? Something is not right with the numbers either-assuming 7% of the population is 105,000 people and divide $115M/yr by that,it comes to almost $1100 for each person??? You need to see the cost per person or household impacted or provided,not the total population! Besides,where will the enormous energy for the desal plan come from which we do not have? San Onofre may or may not come on line either. Is the best and most efficient way to use some of the money to truly install all kinds of water conserving fixtures in homes, offices,restaurants, reduce or disallow certain water use? We will have to get used to less water use anyway as water is less and less available, while not start now when even considering an extra $115M a year and only 7% are impacted?
October 4, 2012 at 1:48 p.m.
( permalink | suggest removal )
© 2014 KPBS