skip to main content

Listen

Read

Watch

Schedules

Programs

Events

Give

Account

Donation Heart Ribbon

Avatar for thatlldo

( thatlldo )

Comments made by thatlldo

Review: 'Sucker Punch'

"unforgivable and a last straw" I can't believe this was said.

Dear Zack, You've lost Miguel, this was the last straw! And completely unforgivable! After he wasted his money on 300, which, was bad source material, (then why did he see it)?? Then he went out and spent it on the Watchmen! Damnit all to hell, where's Charlton Heston to pound the ground for him!?? I wonder if he is going to stop seeing films by you, or continue to grace your films and grind his teeth in rage and share...?

March 25, 2011 at 3:04 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Review: 'Sucker Punch'

"So my review made the list for most scathing reviews of SUCKER PUNCH. I have done my job." Ah, no, this makes you unprofessional. The fact you take pride in your scathiness just proves the point.

March 25, 2011 at 2:51 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Review: 'Sucker Punch'

Hey Beth, why so personal? "never be allowed to direct again"...? Really? So, in all your incite and brilliance you think this guy should get his DGA card revoked? So of 4 movies he directed, 300, Dawn of the Dead, The Watchmen, and this Sucker Punch, you've finally had enough? It's okay, you didn't like that he objectified the women, or you simply just hated this film, but why so vitriolic? I haven't seen this film, but even if it does suck, that makes him 3 out 4 in my book. That's still a pretty good resume'. "He's a hollow shell of a director who's completely shot his wad and has nothing left to give because he never had any vision of creativity of his own to begin with." Wow, it's like he owes you money or you didn't get a writing credit. You know what sucks the most...? Wannabe hack critics that make it personal, and go on the attack. Why? I never read any reviews by Ebert or Roeper that attack in the way you have. It's like you have a personal issue with him. "His "Dawn of the Dead" merely remade(sic) George Romero's zombie classic with a bigger budget and slicker effects;". Do you even know what you're talking about? The Snyder DoD opening 10 minutes alone blew Romero's version out of the water. "There's no one else's vision to steal from", are you f-ing kidding me??? Hey Beth get a clue, Hollywood is all about "stealing", any critic worth their salt knows this, unless of course if you have an axe bury. At least it wasn't some 70's sitcom brought to life or S.W.A.T.. This movie may suck, but kudos to Snyder for trying to bring one of his visions and own works to life. You can't have it both ways, vilify him for stealing other peoples ideas, then crucify him when he has his own, even if it sucks. In the end he'll be directing Superman and you'll be shucking corn in the minor leagues with all the wannabe famous critics. Jockeying for who can write the most vitriolic tag line in their critique in hopes to draw readership. Congrats, you got my attention, now why don't you go re-review that suckfest called Red Riding Hood, which you gave a passing grade....or are you all out of crucifix nails?

March 25, 2011 at 2:46 p.m. ( | suggest removal )