Skip to main content

LATEST UPDATES: Election 2020: Live Results | Tracking COVID-19 | Racial Justice

Visit the Midday Edition homepage

One-Year-Old Reunited With Father In San Diego After Months In Problematic Child Shelter

We're sorry. This audio clip is no longer available.

July 11, 2018 1:43 p.m.

One-Year-Old Reunited With Father In San Diego After Months In Problematic Child Shelter


Jean Guerrero, fronteras reporter, KPBS

Related Story: One-Year-Old Reunited With Father In San Diego After Months In Problematic Child Shelter


This is a rush transcript created by a contractor for KPBS to improve accessibility for the deaf and hard-of-hearing. Please refer to the media file as the formal record of this interview. Opinions expressed by guests during interviews reflect the guest’s individual views and do not necessarily represent those of KPBS staff, members or its sponsors.

Our top story on Midday edition although the Government has missed the deadline set by a federal court in San Diego to reunify all migrant children under age 5 with their parents. Some reunifications of very young migrant children are underway here in San Diego. A father who had not seen his 1 year old son in eight months tearfully hugged his little boy. Loaded up by. Jose Fuentes and his son were separated before the zero tolerance policy officially went into effect. PBS was the first to report on that family separation. Joining me now is PBS frontiers reporter Jean Guerrero. Jean welcome. Thanks Maureen. Tell us about Jose de mara Fuentes and his 1 year old son Mateo. They were separated by Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents after Fuentes asked for asylum at the San Jacinto port of entry. Where did this reunion that we just heard.

Where did that take place that took place here in San Diego last night. The family came down from Los Angeles to meet Jose after he was released from the detention center on parole with an ankle bracelet and you could hear Mateo crying because he didn't he didn't recognize his father had been so long since he had seen him that the other boy the 4 year old was very excited and kind of in disbelief.

Now Fuentes was actually coming to the U.S. from El Salvador with his wife and their other son. As you just mentioned as part of a caravan of asylum seekers last November what happened when they reached the border.

Right. So the family came together through Mexico on the top of the infamous chain La Bestia but they ended up splitting up because the baby was showing signs of dehydration and exhaustion and they wanted to get him somewhere safe as soon as possible said the father Jose went to the San Ysidro port of entry with the baby and asked for asylum. However Immigration Customs Enforcement ended up taking the baby from him and sending the baby to a shelter in Texas saying that he didn't have sufficient proof that he was the father. However he said that he had brought the boy's original birth certificate as well as his own Salvadoran I.D. and turned those documents in to Customs and Border Protection. And I actually saw copies of those documents and when I interviewed him in detention he he told me a little bit about that.

No you haven't. And he's going to come to a strange country that isn't mine to present myself as a child without documents.

It turns out that the shelter where they sent the baby boy is run by this nonprofit called International Educational Services which according to reveal investigation a few weeks ago was closed due to more than a thousand deficiencies including inappropriate sexual contact and harsh punishment for the children and the boys is clearly still suffering some kind of disturbance. I mean his mother tells me that he's been he's just been crying all the time and very fearful of strangers.

The family separation was only ever supposed to apply to people detained for crossing the border illegally. But Jose Fuentes apparently did not do that exactly.

His case raises a lot of questions about the intent I guess behind the family separations because he turned himself in at the port of entry and asked for asylum. The legal way and there are hundreds of others like him who did this and were separated from their children before the zero tolerance and that's actually how the ACLU lawsuits came about. They filed it on behalf of people who had been separated after presenting themselves legally. And that's when the federal judge ended up ordering the reunification not only for people after their tolerance but people separated before as well.

Even though the Fuentes case does not stem from the official zero tolerance policy this reunification took place because of last week's ruling in federal court in San Diego. Is that right.

We actually don't have confirmation of that. The ACLU won't confirm if the boy's name was on the list of 102 children under the age of five. But the attorney on the case from the nonprofit Lothrop Lollo said that she sent the baby's information to the litigators in the case and that it wasn't enough until she was able to cite the court ordered deadline. That's her repeated requests for release on parole were finally accepted. One thing that is worth noting is that the class members for the ACLU lawsuit it's defined as children who are currently in in the custody custody of the government and this baby had already been released from the custody of the government. So technically he doesn't qualify and in the membership of the lawsuit but it is interesting and it is noteworthy that the government had denied the father the family's request for reunification until the court ordered deadline and until the attorney was able to cite that court order deadline it seems to suggest that that that the government is a lot more open now to reunifying families and releasing people on parole.

Jane from your reporting does there seem to be an increasing level of confusion over how immigration asylum cases will be handled. Moving forward yes.

So what we're seeing is that not family members cases are being separated in immigration court even if the family members were never physically separated. So that means that if a. For example if a father comes across with his five year old daughter like one case that I that I spoke to a couple of days ago and are released on parole together and are never separated they may still have their cases separated in court which means that the child will will have to appear in front of the judge by herself. And I spoke to one five year old girl who had to do that here in San Diego. And she just started crying when she was trying to. She had the headphones on and was listening to the translator try to explain what the judge was saying and she just started sobbing because she didn't understand what was happening. And that's something that attorneys in San Diego have told me that they're seeing more and more of under the Trump administration especially over the past month which is creating a lot of inefficiencies and stress that that wasn't being seen before.

What's the next court appearance the government has to make on its efforts to reunite migrant children with their parents.

The federal judge asked for all of the players to meet on Friday to discuss any failed when reunification is for children under the age of five. He asked for any children who are under the age of five who have not been reunified with their parents in time for the deadline. He wanted documentation of that and they're going to review that on Friday.

I've been speaking with previous Fronteras reporter Jean Guerrero. Jeanne thanks. Thank you.