skip to main content

Listen

Read

Watch

Schedules

Programs

Events

Give

Account

Donation Heart Ribbon

Supreme Court Won’t Hear Soledad Cross Case

The U.S. Supreme Court's refusal today to review a lower court ruling that the cross atop Mount Soledad is unconstitutional means the structure will have to be changed significantly to avoid being taken down, according to a professor at the California Western School of Law.

View of the Mount Soledad Veterans Memorial on July 3, 2006 in San Diego, California.  The cross is the center piece of the memorial which sits atop a mountain overlooking San Diego.
Enlarge this image

Above: View of the Mount Soledad Veterans Memorial on July 3, 2006 in San Diego, California. The cross is the center piece of the memorial which sits atop a mountain overlooking San Diego.

The case will revert to local courts to create a remedy that satisfies last year's opinion of the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, said constitutional law professor Glenn Smith. Solutions could range from altering the memorial to going as far as taking the 43-foot-tall cross down, but the status quo will not do, he said.

"Whatever takes place would have to be an overall change so that an observer would not feel like the dominant figure is a Christian symbol,'' Smith told City News Service.

The cross would have to be viewed as one of several elements of a memorial that honors veterans, he said.

The Mount Soledad Memorial has been the subject of ongoing litigation for the last two decades.

In 1989, two Vietnam veterans sued the city of San Diego, seeking to enjoin it from allowing the cross to remain on city land.

The land on which the cross sits has been under the control of the federal government since 2006, when Congress passed a law allowing seizure of the land for use as a war memorial.

"I was somewhat surprised they didn't take the case,'' Smith said. "It seemed like a perfect opportunity to resolve a long-running issue of legal doctrine.''

He said the nation's highest court could decide to take the case later, once a ruling is made on remedies in lower courts.

David Blair-Loy, of the American Civil Liberties Union of San Diego and Imperial Counties, told 10News the high court justices made the right decision in refusing to hear the case.

"The 9th circuit decision was right on point on these facts and circumstances,'' Blair-Loy said. "Clearly the government has no business playing favorites in religion.''

Rep. Brian Bilbray, R-Solana Beach, issued a statement condemning the legal opposition to the cross as "an insult'' to veterans and their service.

"I intend to work with my colleagues to promote religious tolerance and find a way to defend this beloved memorial that has served as a symbol of sacrifice for San Diego's veterans for nearly 100 years,'' Bilbray said.

Comments

Avatar for user 'Peking_Duck_SD'

Peking_Duck_SD | June 25, 2012 at 11:48 a.m. ― 2 years, 11 months ago

Fire-up the bulldozer, boys!!

( | suggest removal )

Avatar for user 'marasmom'

marasmom | June 25, 2012 at 1:38 p.m. ― 2 years, 11 months ago

To my congressman, Brian Bilbray -- as the daughter of 2 WWII Marine veterans, the sister of 3 Navy and Marine vets, and aunt to a Navy Commander (and SEAL) retiring next month -- the INSULT to veterans and their families who have sacrificed so much to defend our Constitution is that shameless politicians like YOU invoke their sacrifice to support a clear violation of a core principal of our Constitution: that our government shall establish no religion. Stop it.

( | suggest removal )