Calif. Lawmakers To Take Up Potential Water Fixes
Monday, November 2, 2009
California Legislation designed to provide long-term solutions to California's water challenges is scheduled to go before both houses of the Legislature on Monday, although the prospects for passage remain uncertain.
Republican and Democratic lawmakers have introduced competing bills that have similar outlines but differ on key points. The discussions center on creating an independent mechanism to govern the state's water supply, initiating a spending program for new water storage and conservation programs, and establishing environmental safeguards for the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, the heart of California's water-delivery system.
Legislative staff have been trying to reconcile the partisan differences over the past week.
"I'm feeling some momentum here," said Senate President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg, D-Sacramento. "Now's the time to go."
Lawmakers will consider the complex water fixes in a special session, the third one called this fall by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger. Education reform and a potential overhaul of the state's tax system will be considered in separate sessions.
A bipartisan agreement on how to upgrade California's water supply and delivery system would be a major victory for Schwarzenegger, who has been pressing lawmakers to focus on the issue. He even threatened to veto their bills earlier this year if they did not present him with a water deal, although he ultimately relented.
For decades, governors and lawmakers have been unable to find compromise on a way to expand and divvy up the vital resource. Farmers, municipal water districts, environmentalists and sport fishermen often have competing agendas that pull lawmakers in different directions.
The debate also has pitted Northern California, which receives most of the rain and snow, against Southern California, home to a majority of the state's residents.
At the heart of the debate is the delta. The largest estuary on the West Coast, it provides fresh water to two-thirds of California's residents and irrigates thousands of acres of cropland.
Its place at the center of the state's water-delivery system has placed the delta's ecosystem in peril, with the massive pumps that draw water south being blamed in part for declining fish populations.
The latest proposals from Democrats and Republicans address California's water problems on two fronts:
- One set of policy bills would create a seven-member commission to oversee the environmentally fragile delta. It would mandate conservation and groundwater monitoring, while setting higher penalties for taking water illegally.
- The companion bills would authorize $9.4 billion in bonds to pay for new reservoirs and underground storage, water recycling programs, local water projects and delta restoration. The bond would go before voters next year.
Under the Democratic bills, money would be set aside money for new storage without dedicating funding for specific dams.
Schwarzenegger, Republican lawmakers and farmers have pushed for strengthening the language to ensure that some of the money will go to building dams. The two most likely locations for new reservoirs are in the Sacramento Valley north of the state capital and in the Sierra foothills above Fresno. A third proposal would raise the height of an existing dam in the eastern San Francisco Bay area.
The Legislature's nonpartisan analyst's office said the bond's cost could force the state to spend 10 percent of its revenue each year to pay off debt.
Placing the bond measure on a 2010 ballot requires a two-thirds vote in the Democratic-controlled Legislature and thus will need some support from Republicans, who are likely to withhold their votes until the legislation is shaped to their liking.
Republicans don't like Democratic proposals to have stronger enforcement of water rights or to require the state to monitor groundwater use on private property. Assembly Minority Leader Sam Blakeslee, R-San Luis Obispo, said he has been disappointed in the direction of the talks.
"After weeks and weeks of discussion, we find our concerns evidently were not taken seriously," he said.
Please stay on topic and be as concise as possible. Leaving a comment means you agree to our Community Discussion Rules. We like civilized discourse. We don't like spam, lying, profanity, harassment or personal attacks.