skip to main content

Listen

Read

Watch

Schedules

Programs

Events

Give

Account

Donation Heart Ribbon

Survey Finds ‘Dreamers’ Are Politically Engaged And Benefitting From Temporary Legal Status

Deborah Robles, a "documented DREAMer" and organizer with the Arizona DREAM Act Coalition, addresses the crowd before they head into the governor's office.

Above: Deborah Robles, a "documented DREAMer" and organizer with the Arizona DREAM Act Coalition, addresses the crowd before they head into the governor's office.

Aired 5/21/14 on KPBS News.

A nationwide survey finds many undocumented immigrants are getting their first jobs and driver's licenses since getting temporary legal status under an Obama administration program.

Young immigrants who have been granted temporary legal status under an Obama administration program are getting their first jobs, first cars and first credit cards, according to a nationwide survey of undocumented youth, often referred to as “dreamers.”

Results of the survey also suggest that most young immigrants living in the U.S. illegally don’t identify strongly with either major political party, a finding that the study author says should be encouraging to Republicans.

“This emerging constituency is more up for grabs politically than previously thought,” said Tom Wong, the University of California San Diego political scientist who authored the survey.

The survey was completed online by nearly 1,500 dreamers in 42 states and Washington D.C.

It found that 70 percent of respondents got their first job or moved to a new job after receiving two-year legal status under the federal Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA, program.

Twenty percent reported buying their first car and 37 percent reported getting their first credit card. Wong said the car purchases hint at the economic potential of expanding DACA to include more immigrants — which some advocacy groups have called for — or passing immigration reform.

“This one result is a microcosm of that potentially positive economic impact,” Wong said.

The survey was commissioned by the United We Dream network, the largest national network of immigrant youth, and Unbound Philanthropy, a pro-immigrant foundation. It was administered online via a peer-to-peer referral technique and augmented by Facebook ads urging undocumented youth to take the survey.

The new survey provides fodder for the debate over immigration reform. The Republican Party is split on the issue, with some leaders arguing that creating a path to citizenship for millions of immigrants would alienate the party’s conservative base and create an army of new liberal-leaning voters.

Just less than half of respondents to the DACA survey identified as Democrat, while 44 percent identified as Independent or other. Just 2 percent identified as Republican.

Results were similar in a recent Pew Research Center poll of so-called Millennials (aged 18 to 33). Nearly half of non-white respondents said they were political independents, and 9 percent identified as Republican.

Even if dreamers don’t get a path to citizenship, Wong said, “they are still a formidable political bloc, not so much at the voting booth but in different forms of advocacy.”

In recent months, groups like United We Dream have pushed President Barack Obama to exercise executive authority to limit deportations. In April, Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson announced that his department would review its deportation policies with an eye toward making them more humane.

Respondents to the DACA survey also appear to be more politically engaged than average voters. More than 40 percent said they had participated in a political rally or demonstration, whereas just 6 percent of voters surveyed in a 2012 national election study said they had done so.

Plus, 55 percent of dreamers surveyed said they felt they could affect what government does, and 88 percent said they felt they could “stop unjust deportations” by organizing.

“Their undocumented status politicizes them,” Wong said.

That appears to be the case with Abril Rodriguez, a 27-year-old DACA recipient in San Diego. She said her political activism started with rallies and protests on immigration issues, but then branched out to education matters and healthcare.

“It just bleeds to different things because of immigration status,” she said of her civic engagement.

Since getting DACA status, the UC San Diego student has gotten her driver’s license and a job doing outreach about the state's healthcare exchange, Covered California.

The federal government began granting deportation relief to undocumented youth (age 30 or younger) under the DACA program in 2012. Applicants must show they came to the U.S. before they turned 16, have attended school here or served in the military and have no serious criminal record.

As of March 2014, 550,000 immigrants have been granted DACA relief. Nearly 30 percent of them reside in California.

Comments

Avatar for user 'cdtaillon'

cdtaillon | May 22, 2014 at 9:47 a.m. ― 4 months ago

I disagree with the argument that "creating a path to citizenship for millions of immigrants would alienate the party’s conservative base and create an army of new liberal-leaning voters." Most dreamers value education and hard work, and they want to contribute to their communities and the nation as a whole. They are not the type of residents, who would vote for legislation which provides benefits for those who choose to be unemployed and live off of the hard work of other Americans. Many dreamers even feel that the Democrats have not done as much as possible to reform immigration laws. Perhaps if Republicans step up and propose legislation, which would provide permanent residency to dreamers, who have shown that they can be intelligent, politically engaged, citizens in the future, then they would gain more support from existing voters. I strongly support dreamers and I feel that the values which they embrace would lead many to vote (if granted citizenship) inline with Republicans.

( | suggest removal )

Avatar for user 'DeLaRick'

DeLaRick | May 22, 2014 at 10:54 a.m. ― 4 months ago

cdtaillon,

You're basically saying that once these dreamers have been helped by society they'll turn into hypocritical conservatives who think they're standing on 3rd base because they hit a triple. That's entirely possible. Ethnic minorities can be the worst Uncle Tom's out there because they believe everyone should follow their blueprint regardless of circumstances.

( | suggest removal )

Avatar for user 'CaliforniaDefender'

CaliforniaDefender | May 22, 2014 at 11:23 a.m. ― 4 months ago

Plus, 55 percent of dreamers surveyed said they felt they could affect what government does, and 88 percent said they felt they could “stop unjust deportations” by organizing.

“Their undocumented status politicizes them,” Wong said.

===

Does citizenship mean anything anymore?

Now you can live, study, work, and engage in politics without it.

What is the "benefit" of being a citizen? Paying taxes? Getting drafted? Jury duty?

Why would anyone want to be a citizen?

( | suggest removal )

Avatar for user 'CaliforniaDefender'

CaliforniaDefender | May 22, 2014 at 11:40 a.m. ― 4 months ago

"Wong said the car purchases hint at the economic potential of expanding DACA to include more immigrants."

===

Really. 20% of illegal aliens bought a clunker car for probably $1000 or less? That is a pitiful $22 million. Besides these are person to person transactions which means ZERO tax, thus ZERO impact to California.

Wong is Wrong.

He is stretching like Gumby as he makes a thinly veiled political argument to change demographics in favor of the extreme left.

( | suggest removal )

Avatar for user 'Missionaccomplished'

Missionaccomplished | May 22, 2014 at 12:05 p.m. ― 4 months ago

CA Offender tries to be funny: "Wong is wrong."

So now, on top of your other cultural chauvinisms, you are now making fun of how many Chinese speak English??? Way to go, man.

( | suggest removal )

Avatar for user 'CaliforniaDefender'

CaliforniaDefender | May 22, 2014 at 12:40 p.m. ― 4 months ago

Missionfailed,

I said Wong (the guy making the claims) is wrong (because they are outlandishly false). Is that funny?

You really truly have nothing left to debate. We've all shot down your arguments so many times that you've only got insults to carelessly fling.

Way to go, man.

( | suggest removal )

Avatar for user 'Peking_Duck_SD'

Peking_Duck_SD | May 22, 2014 at 1:26 p.m. ― 4 months ago

DLR, I agree. It's sort of like the "Log-Cabin Republicans".

They want to take on the same bigoted views of the right-wing but have the ONE EXCEPTION of eliminating discrimination of gays from the agenda.

In response to yours and the first poster's comment, I'm sure there would be a mixed-bag.

You will always have the "I got mine so *$?!!% the rest of you crowd", but you will also have more thoughtful people who remember their struggles and can empathize with struggles others are going through even if they are not exactly the same.

I remember a long time ago someone asked me if I would still be a Liberal if I were not gay, and my resounding answer is HELL YES!!

It's not about one single issue, it's about fairness, justice, and the ability to not only empathize with your own personal situation but with others as well.

( | suggest removal )

Avatar for user 'DeLaRick'

DeLaRick | May 22, 2014 at 2:24 p.m. ― 4 months ago

Duck,

Exactly! Empathy is one of humanity's greatest virtues. In the few areas of life where I've been fortunate enough to be mildly successful, I wouldn't advise anyone to do things the exact same way I did. Different strokes for different folks and all that.

( | suggest removal )