skip to main content









Donation Heart Ribbon

A Note To Owners Of (Potentially) Deadly Toyotas

— I got a note in the mail this week from Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A. telling me I still may not be safe. I own a 2006 Prius and they told me a safety “defect” exists in 2004 through 2009 model year Prius vehicles.

The Prius leaves a smaller carbon footprint than a conventional car even thou...
Enlarge this image

Above: The Prius leaves a smaller carbon footprint than a conventional car even though it requires more energy to manufacture.

“The defect is the potential for an unsecured or incompatible driver’s floor mat to interfere with the accelerator pedal and cause it to get stuck in the wide open position,” they said.

News stories of deadly Toyotas have been banished as the media and the public have moved on to other things. But the lawsuits continue and the car company keeps trying to squelch its liability. Therefore the note.

Toyota has encouraged me to go to my dealer for a free inspection if my vehicle is equipped with a set of “optional genuine Toyota All Weather Floor Mats.” Of course, I have no idea what they mean by that.

But the car company says it’s just trying to make it “less likely” that my floor mat will interfere with the accelerator. I love letters written by tort lawyers!

Earlier this year, I covered the story of James Sikes’ runaway Prius on I-8 in San Diego County.

In case you don’t remember, Sikes claims his 2008 Prius took off on its own one day, accelerating out of control as he desperately jammed on the brakes. He said the brakes didn’t work and he finally stopped after a state cop pulled alongside him, while traveling over 90 mph, and told Sikes to depress the brake and parking brake simultaneously.

Soon after the event, Toyota staged a theatrical press conference in the Qualcomm Stadium parking lot where they said Sikes’s story appeared to be hogwash. They tested the car and the brakes were fine. Shifting into neutral worked fine. Depressing the brake and accelerator together engaged an override system that shut off the engine, and there was nothing wrong with the car’s electronics or computer software.

You’d expect Toyota to say all that. But the National Highway Safety Administration basically came to the same conclusion.

I should point out that I heard a tape of the 911 call Sikes made from his car when he thought it was running out of control. He sounded terrified. Sikes may be a dope but I don’t think he’s a liar.

A faulty floor mat has been blamed for one fatal accident in San Diego County involving a Lexus, which is a Toyota product. But the floor mat in my Prius is secured to the floor with a couple of clips – it has been since the day I bought it. It doesn’t move. It’s just lying there.

You’d think the Sikes story, which became an international story, along with the many Toyota recalls and all that floor mat anxiety would have torpedoed profits for Toyota. But the car maker made quarterly profits of $2.2 billion between April and June this year, in the very midst of the controversy.

They say no publicity is bad publicity. I don’t believe that. But consumers do seem to be able to keep things in perspective.

To view PDF documents, Download Acrobat Reader.


Avatar for user 'randolphslinky'

randolphslinky | October 18, 2010 at 8:35 a.m. ― 6 years, 5 months ago

The car's computer showed that Sikes was lying about what happend - but even if you want to suggest that Toyota would of course say that, how about the fact that the man had filed for bankruptcy, has been involved in filing dubious insurance claims before, and ran a swinger's website? Toyota may have some issues to resolve, but I think in this case Sikes is a character that needs more scrutiny than the Prius.

( | suggest removal )

Avatar for user 'Tom Fudge'

Tom Fudge, KPBS Staff | October 18, 2010 at 1:26 p.m. ― 6 years, 5 months ago

I can't prove Sikes wasn't lying and I know some facts of the case suggest he was. But two things definitely suggest that he wasn't. First, he has not sued Toyota. His motivation for lying, we speculate, would have been to shake down the car company in some kind of pain-and-suffering civil action. Secondly, there's the 911 tape. James Sikes is not a professional actor, and I'd think he'd have to be to pull off such a performance. The voice of the man I heard on that tape was panicked and terrified. I don't know why the brakes didn't work for him when they worked for everyone else. But I do know that fear could have easily caused him forgo many other things that would have stopped the car -- like just turning off the ignition or putting it into neutral. Yes, we can speculate but I don't think we'll ever know for sure what happen in the case of James Sikes.

( | suggest removal )