skip to main content

Listen

Read

Watch

Schedules

Programs

Events

Give

Account

Donation Heart Ribbon

Proposition 26 - Taxes And Fees

Taxes and fees are among the most important tools lawmakers have at their disposal to increase revenue. “People use the words loosely either way,” said Maureen Gorsen, a lawyer hired by the supporters of Proposition 26.

Special Feature State & Local Propositions

Interactive reference guide for state and local propositions in the November 2010 Election.

“If they call it a ‘tax’ it’s subject to a two-thirds vote, if they call if a ‘fee’ it’s only subject to a majority vote but there’s been a lack of clarity as to what the difference is.”

Gorsen said that lack of clarity is why fees should be subject to the same two-thirds legislative majority requirement as taxes. She said Californians see new fees or fee increases repeatedly, and they feel just like taxes.

“You know they’re putting this fee on this marriage license and a fee on serving alcohol at a bar,” said Gorsen. “That is in fact a tax because it’s raising general revenue. So it’ll bring honesty to what we’re trying to accomplish.”

But opponents of Proposition 26 said passing the measure would make it more difficult for California to raise revenues and balance budgets.

Mark Tindall is the vice president of the Sacramento Police Officers Association. He said the general fund is what pays for police officers and fire fighters.

“If you changed those fees into taxes, what’s going to happen is general funds will be cut even further, public safety will suffer, the citizens will suffer, we can’t accept that and we’re really concerned,” said Tindall. “We don’t see any place else where we can make any more cuts.”

Opponents said they’re also concerned Proposition 26 would make it easier for big companies to avoid fees when they’ve responsible for public health, safety or environmental problems.

Chevron and Exxon Mobil, among other companies, have donated millions of dollars to support the measure. Sierra Club California Director Bill McGavern said if Proposition 26 passes, those companies wouldn’t have to pay for environmental damages if they were to have an accident, like an oil spill.

“Prop 26 truly is the polluter protection act. It’s a toxic sleeper on the ballot that hasn’t gotten nearly as much attention as it should,” said McGavern.

Supporters of Proposition 26 say they’re not trying to protect anybody -- they’re trying to bring transparency to the process of revenue generation.

Comments

Avatar for user 'EarlRichards'

EarlRichards | October 27, 2010 at 12:42 p.m. ― 4 years ago

PROP 26 is just as damaging as PROP 23. Prop 26 is a treacherous, Big Oil rip-off, which "passes the buck" from oil corporation, clean-up fees to the taxpayer, who will pay the oil recycling fees, the materials hazards fees and other fees. If you do not understand the ambiguities and the intrigues behind Prop 26, then, vote no. BP, Shell and Exxon Mobil are silent partners in Prop 26. Power to the people.

( | suggest removal )