skip to main content

Listen

Read

Watch

Schedules

Programs

Events

Give

Account

Donation Heart Ribbon

Grocery Workers Check Out Possibility Of A Strike

Audio

Aired 6/10/11

Baggers, checkers and butchers at San Diego's three largest grocery store chains may exchange their smocks for picket signs soon.

— Yellow shirted union workers clapped and cheered as their leaders stood at the podium. The steps up to the Labor Council's Mission Valley offices were packed with children earlier this week. "Protect my mommy's health care" read one sign. Who pays for health care is the main reason 10,000 local union workers do not have a new contract.

"We want our health care. We want you to protect our health care," said Mickey Kasparian, president of the United Food and Commercial Workers Union Local 135. "So my challenge is to the employers. Get serious. Get real at the table. Or you will suffer the consequences of 192,000 people in San Diego County."

The 192,000 people are union members represented by the AFL-CIO Labor Council. Those workers belong to more than 30 different unions and those people are pledging to help if the grocery workers walk off the job.

Grocery Workers Strike in 2004
Enlarge this image

Above: Grocery Workers Strike in 2004

"And we're going to provide the list of union places that people can go," said Lorena Gonzalez, secretary and treasurer of the AFL-CIO Labor Council. "Places that do provide health care and benefits to their workers. People that do provide a good level of service and we're going to encourage our members to show at those places rather than these big three."

Union officials want to avoid the brutal grocery store walkout that began in 2003 and lasted into 2004. Industry analysts said Vons, Ralph's and Albertson's lost about $2 billion worth of business, and the stores never regained their market share once the dispute was settled. But in the end, the grocers got most of the contract demands they asked for.

Some health care costs shifted from the stores to the workers and new employees got far fewer benefits than those already working.

These contract talks are coming at a difficult time for the stores and the 60,000 union workers, said Ruben Garcia, a labor law attorney who teaches at San Diego's Cal Western School of Law. The recession has hammered the economy and workers have had no appreciable wage gains in several years.

"That is certainly putting a lot of strain economically on the workers in negotiations and the companies too are facing increased competition and decreased revenue," said Garcia.

Workers may be eyeing the improving economic situation with some optimism, while the stores are looking at increasing competition in the the Southern California region. Even so, Garcia said there there is probably some saber rattling going on.

"Strikes, they are calculated and strategized for the workers and for management. They are not greatly painful. They are all about strategy at this point, on both sides, " according to Garcia.

Representatives for the grocery chains did not return calls seeking comment. However, in a written statement earlier this week, the grocery chains called their health care proposals fair.

The companies said the proposal offers health benefits to those working as few as 16 hours a week. The businesses also said the unions shouldn't be talking about a strike because contract talks are still underway.

Talking isn't enough said UFCW Local 135 President Mickey Kasparian. He said the companies stopped paying for worker benefits when the old contract expired in March.

"Our benefits fund is being depleted every day because our contract's expired. So just to say, let's keep negotiating until we get something done, puts our member's benefits at risk," said Kasparian. "Even while we continue to bargain. So its very important that we make progress, get a deal. And resolve this. We don't want to repeat 2003 and 2004."

Both sides are working with a federal mediator in an effort to reach an agreement. Neither side is talking about the next round of bargaining will happen.

Comments

Avatar for user 'HarryStreet'

HarryStreet | June 10, 2011 at 2:11 p.m. ― 3 years, 3 months ago

Grocery workers make an average hourly wage of less than $10 per hour. Their benefits have been mediocre and hardly any of them can earn a living that pays the bills. All this and the grocery companies fight to give them less, but say they're doing their workers right.

It's very sad when we have people content with earning less simply because our expectations are to take what little you can while you can. I hope the grocery workers get what they want.

( | suggest removal )

Avatar for user 'jessie08'

jessie08 | June 11, 2011 at 10:15 a.m. ― 3 years, 3 months ago

You would have to be living under a rock to think that grocery is a career anymore. This is no longer 1950 nor is it even 1980. I watch many people with more education than a grocery worker left out in the cold by companies now. It takes little to do many of the jobs in grocery. I would honestly say out of the 120 average that work in a store 25 are qualified to earn a living wage and benefits. How can I say this? I work there and know the competency level. The competition in this industry no longer supports the allowance of a career as a deli worker til you retire. There is just not the market share for the profits to do this. I tell the people whom I work with to go back to school. I am doing the same. The union lives under antiquated ideas and strategies. Mickey lives in the past as a big time union boss scraping off the perks for himself while calling the companies greedy. It is definitively time for change.

( | suggest removal )

Avatar for user 'HarryStreet'

HarryStreet | June 11, 2011 at 1:08 p.m. ― 3 years, 3 months ago

Yes, change is needed, but more so from the mindset of CEOs and company shareholders. I worked in a grocery company too and would not go there now for lack of career opportunities, but that's because the CEO and company shareholders dumbed-down the job and lowered customer service expectations.

The cashier for instance, is the first and last person a customer sees. This person could treat the customer in such a friendly way that the customer would return again and again. When the CEO figured they could replace a professionally mature individual who arrives to work on time with a positive attitude, in exchange for someone uneducated and unwilling to put their best foot forward, they removed the customer shopping experience from fun to 'who cares?'

Many veterans in the grocery business have college education, but stayed on because of the once-great benefits that other companies could not match. I agree that with what the grocery companies offer now, who would want a job there. But how does that justify pay increases for the CEO, officers and shareholders? It's no wonder people go to Costco, Henry's, Jimbo's and other grocery companies as an alternative.

As for Mickey, he's fighting for those who WANT to stay because of their passion. Sure there are some who haven't figured what they want to do. What job doesn't have those people? I know people with college degrees working in the field they trained who are miserable. I've worked alongside engineers and doctors who left the industry they trained for to be in retail and grocery stores because they like working and being around people. The jobs they came from offered none of the relationships you can have with the community like the grocery companies once did.

It's only because I see many jobs harder and harder to come by that I feel the grocery companies should step up and be a leader in the industry and pay people what's right over taking the money for themselves. The CEOs and shareholders have enough.

( | suggest removal )