skip to main content

Listen

Read

Watch

Schedules

Programs

Events

Give

Account

Donation Heart Ribbon

Obama Unveils $500 Million Gun Violence Package

Above: U.S. President Barack Obama signs a series of executive orders about the administration's new gun law proposals as children who wrote letters to the White House about gun violence, (L-R) Hinna Zeejah, Taejah Goode, Julia Stokes and Grant Fritz, look on in the Eisenhower Executive Office building, on January 16, 2012 in Washington, DC.

Braced for a fight, President Barack Obama on Wednesday unveiled the most sweeping proposals for curbing gun violence in two decades, pressing a reluctant Congress to pass universal background checks and bans on military-style assault weapons and high-capacity ammunition magazines like the ones used in the Newtown, Conn., school shooting.

The president's long list of executive orders also include:

— Ordering tougher penalties for people who lie on background checks and requiring federal agencies to make relevant data available to the federal background check system.

— Ending limits that make it more difficult for the government to research gun violence, such as gathering data on guns that fall into criminal hands.

— Requiring federal law enforcement to trace guns recovered in criminal investigations.

— Giving schools flexibility to use federal grant money to improve school safety, such as by hiring school resource officers.

— Giving communities grants to institute programs to keep guns away from people who shouldn't have them.

A month after that horrific massacre, Obama also used his presidential powers to enact 23 measures that don't require the backing of lawmakers. The president's executive actions include ordering federal agencies to make more data available for background checks, appointing a director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, and directing the Centers for Disease Control to research gun violence.

But the president, speaking at White House ceremony, focused his attention on the divided Congress, saying only lawmakers could enact the most effective measures for preventing more mass shootings.

"To make a real and lasting difference, Congress must act," Obama said. "And Congress must act soon."

The president vowed to use "whatever weight this office holds" to press lawmakers into action on his $500 million plan. He is also calling for improvements in school safety, including putting 1,000 police officers in schools and bolstering mental health care by training more health professionals to deal with young people who may be at risk.

Even supportive lawmakers say the president's gun control proposals — most of which are opposed by the powerful National Rifle Association — face long odds on Capitol Hill.

House Speaker John Boehner's office was non-committal to the president's package of proposed legislation, but signaled no urgency to act. "House committees of jurisdiction will review these recommendations," Boehner spokesman Michael Steel said. "And if the Senate passes a bill, we will also take a look at that."

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy said ahead of Obama's presentation that he didn't know whether an assault weapons ban could pass the Senate, but said there are some measures that can, such as improved background checks.

"There are some who say nothing will pass. I disagree with that," Leahy, D-Vt., told students at Georgetown University Law Center. "What I'm interested in is what we can get."

Acknowledging the tough fight ahead, Obama said there will be pundits, politicians and special interest groups that will seek to "gin up fear" that the White House wants to take away the right to own a gun.

"Behind the scenes, they'll do everything they can to block any commonsense reform and make sure nothing changes whatsoever," he said. "The only way we will be able to change is if their audience, their constituents, their membership says this time must be different, that this time we must do something to protect our communities and our kids."

The president was flanked by children who wrote him letters about gun violence in the weeks following the Newtown shooting. Families of those killed in the massacre, as well as survivors of the shooting, were also in the audience, along with law enforcement officers and congressional lawmakers.

"This is our first task as a society, keeping our children safe," Obama said. "This is how we will be judged."

Seeking to expand the impetus for addressing gun violence beyond the Newtown shooting, the president said more than 900 Americans have been killed by guns in the month since the elementary school massacre.

"Every day we wait, the number will keep growing," he said.

The White House has signaled that Obama could launch a campaign to boost public support for his proposals. Nearly six in 10 Americans want stricter gun laws in the aftermath of the Newtown shooting, with majorities favoring a nationwide ban on military-style, rapid-fire weapons and limits on gun violence depicted in video games, movies and TV shows, according to a new Associated Press-GfK poll.

A lopsided 84 percent of adults would like to see the establishment of a federal standard for background checks for people buying guns at gun shows, the poll showed.

The president based his proposals on recommendations from an administration-wide task force led by Vice President Joe Biden. His plan marks the most comprehensive effort to address gun violence since Congress passed the 1994 ban on high-grade, military-style assault weapons. The ban expired in 2004, and Obama wants lawmakers to renew and expand it.

Other measures Obama wants Congress to take up include limiting high-capacity ammunition magazines and requiring background checks for all gun buyers in an attempt to close the so-called "gun-show loophole" that allows people to buy guns at trade shows and over the Internet without submitting to background checks.

Obama also intends to seek confirmation for B. Todd Jones, who has served as acting director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives since 2011.

The president's plan does little to address violent images in video games, movies and entertainment, beyond asking the CDC to study their impact on gun crimes. Some pro-gun lawmakers who are open to addressing stricter arms legislation have insisted they would do so only in tandem with recommendations for addressing violence in entertainment.

Comments

Avatar for user 'JeanMarc'

JeanMarc | January 16, 2013 at 11:48 a.m. ― 1 year, 6 months ago

And this package will do nothing to prevent gun crime, nor will it keep guns out of the hands of criminals. Good job.

( | suggest removal )

Avatar for user 'davidfrench'

davidfrench | January 16, 2013 at 12:02 p.m. ― 1 year, 6 months ago

And it adds yet more debt to the tune of half a billion dollars (!) of which >40% of that we'll have to borrow. Where is the common sense?!

( | suggest removal )

Avatar for user 'llk'

llk | January 16, 2013 at 12:25 p.m. ― 1 year, 6 months ago

"this package will do nothing to prevent gun crime"

This claim is 100% unsubstantiated. Feel free to substantiate it for us.

"it adds yet more debt to the tune of half a billion dollars (!) of which >40% of that we'll have to borrow"

If one innocent American life is spared, it's borrowed money well spent. Raise taxes on the rich if you're so concerned with debt. Some things are more important.

( | suggest removal )

Avatar for user 'llk'

llk | January 16, 2013 at 12:29 p.m. ― 1 year, 6 months ago

Shame on the NRA for doing so much to saturate this country with guns. I'm worried there's no going back now. Let's hope President Obama's proposals can be passed, enacted, and that they make a difference. In my opinion, it's a good start.

( | suggest removal )

Avatar for user 'CaliforniaDefender'

CaliforniaDefender | January 16, 2013 at 2:39 p.m. ― 1 year, 6 months ago

The president vowed to use "whatever weight this office holds"...

===

Which is less than a freeze dried peanut.

Look at the long list of fluffy executive orders he issued. Beyond a nice photo-op with children, they will do nothing to alter the use of firearms in America.

Nor should he do anything. This is a matter for each state to decide. States have the power to limit gun manufacturing, sales, and use depending on the needs and desires of their own people. Washington has no role in this.

( | suggest removal )

Avatar for user 'Peking_Duck_SD'

Peking_Duck_SD | January 16, 2013 at 8:21 p.m. ― 1 year, 6 months ago

I applaud President Obama for introducing these COMMON SENSE regulations knowing the powerful gun lobby is going to attack him fiercely.

Of all the things proposed, the most important in my opinion is funding research into guns and gun violence.

A tactic of the NRA that some may not realise has been to block research related to gun violence. This is why today we have very little data in this area.

Regulations should be based on the data, and the gun lobby doesn't want us collecting it because they are afraid of what it will reveal.

The gun lobby wants to be able to say stupid things like "more guns make us safer" and then block studies from testing their nonsensical ideas because they know they are full of it.

( | suggest removal )

Avatar for user 'JeanMarc'

JeanMarc | January 17, 2013 at 10:02 a.m. ― 1 year, 6 months ago

If a psycho wants to kill people they will find a way. Bottom line.

( | suggest removal )

Avatar for user 'Missionaccomplished'

Missionaccomplished | January 17, 2013 at 10:05 a.m. ― 1 year, 6 months ago

CA OFF

Fluffy? Freeze-dried peanut? So he's weak?

( | suggest removal )

Avatar for user 'llk'

llk | January 17, 2013 at 10:41 a.m. ― 1 year, 6 months ago

"If a psycho wants to kill people they will find a way. Bottom line."

No, sorry, that's a line, but it's not the bottom line. The bottom line is that we as a society do our best to take preventative measures to make the odds of that happening as narrow as possible. That is the bottom line.

( | suggest removal )

Avatar for user 'DeLaRick'

DeLaRick | January 17, 2013 at 12:06 p.m. ― 1 year, 6 months ago

Some motorists and motorcyclists made the same reactive statements about helmet and seat belt laws. With the benefit of time, the sensical nature of those laws has become evident even with anecdotal data. The same will happen with gun laws restricting assault weapons.

( | suggest removal )

Avatar for user 'JeanMarc'

JeanMarc | January 17, 2013 at 12:46 p.m. ― 1 year, 6 months ago

The bottom line is still no matter how much society tries to prevent it, if someone really wants to kill a bunch of people, they will.

( | suggest removal )

Avatar for user 'llk'

llk | January 17, 2013 at 1:08 p.m. ― 1 year, 6 months ago

That is well understood by all, JeanMarc, but you don't seem to understand that we don't just throw up our hands and say "oh well!" We try and prevent it.

The problem is that we disagree on the best way to prevent it.

( | suggest removal )

Avatar for user 'benz72'

benz72 | January 17, 2013 at 3:31 p.m. ― 1 year, 6 months ago

Yes Ilk, we do.
Hopefully we can agree on something that is effective at reducing crime and preserving freedom.

( | suggest removal )