skip to main content

Listen

Read

Watch

Schedules

Programs

Events

Give

Account

Donation Heart Ribbon

San Diego Has History Of Starkly Opposing Opinions On Gay Marriage

Video

Mayor Sanders Gay Marriage

UPDATE June 26: Former Mayor Sanders has released a statement on Wednesday's Supreme Court ruling regarding Proposition 8:

“Today’s Supreme Court ruling marks a significant victory for our country and for marriage equality. This means that Proposition 8 is unconstitutional and cannot be enforced, and I am glad that Governor Brown is already pushing for same-sex marriages to resume in California.

As many of you know, this issue is very personal for me and for my family. I will continue to speak out on this issue until equality is provided for all couples.”


Six years ago, then-Mayor Jerry Sanders stood in front of reporters at City Hall to offer them an explanation.

Word was that he was planning to veto a City Council resolution opposing Proposition 8, the measure meant to bar gay couples from getting married in California. But when Sanders showed up to a hastily-planned press conference, he said something reporters weren't expecting.

Through tears, he told them that he had been wrong. He could not look at members of his staff, residents of his city or his own daughter and tell them that their relationships meant less than his own, he said. He did not veto the resolution.

Video of the press conference went viral and is still available on YouTube.

Sanders told KPBS last year that his very public change of heart brought with it criticism from proponents of Proposition 8. He said facing those criticisms was worth it.

Thousands of San Diegans march from Balboa Park to the Hall of Justice in downtown San Diego to protest the California Supreme Court's decision to uphold Proposition 8.  Photo taken May 26, 2009.

Above: Thousands of San Diegans march from Balboa Park to the Hall of Justice in downtown San Diego to protest the California Supreme Court's decision to uphold Proposition 8. Photo taken May 26, 2009.

"I think there finally comes a time when you say 'I've got to do what's right,'" Sanders said. "It becomes a very personal decision at that point."

Though Sanders was held up as an example of how long-held attitudes and beliefs toward gay marriage could change, the about-face of another prominent San Diego figure was not as well received.

Doug Manchester, a hotelier who eventually purchased the San Diego Union-Tribune in 2010, handed over $125,000 to the Proposition 8 campaign.

His donation brought on a boycott of three of his hotels, including the Manchester Grand Hyatt.

Eventually, Manchester issued an apology that was posted on the Manchester Financial Group's website. It noted that he was not anti-gay and that he was in favor of domestic partnerships and civil unions. Gay marriage, however, was not mentioned in Manchester's "in favor of" list.

He also promised thousands of dollars to an organization that promotes civil unions. The Manchester Grand Hyatt, which was the main focus of the Manchester hotels boycott, was eventually handed over to the Hyatt chain of hotels.

When Manchester purchased the San Diego Union-Tribune, many in the LGBT community shared concerns that his feelings on gay marriage would work to change coverage of that community.

Other groups including churches, conservative groups and even the Asian Heritage Coalition came out in favor of Proposition 8 and stuck to those opinions.

The Grossmont Union High School District, for example, was the only school district in the entire state to pass a resolution in favor of Proposition 8.

Comments

Avatar for user 'Missionaccomplished'

Missionaccomplished | June 26, 2013 at 12:19 p.m. ― 1 year ago

Irrelevant now. Why is KPBS giving him the time of day.

It could it be . . . the issue he is speaking about??? Nah . . .

( | suggest removal )

Avatar for user 'Peking_Duck_SD'

Peking_Duck_SD | June 26, 2013 at 2:37 p.m. ― 1 year ago

It should also be mentioned San Diego has one of the most virulent anti-gay attorneys on the nation - Mr. LiMandri.

This man is like a higher-paid version of an am glance chaser, only instead of ambulances he chases opportunities to legalize bigotry.

I can't recall a prominent gay rights issue being litigated in our city were this man, often pro bono, has to stick his tentacles into it.

( | suggest removal )