skip to main content

Listen

Read

Watch

Schedules

Programs

Events

Give

Account

Donation Heart Ribbon

San Diego’s Public Art Conversation Continues

The 25 foot sculpture on the San Diego bayfront called "Unconditional Surrender."  It is based on the famous photograph by Alfred Eisenstaedt featuring a soldier kissing a nurse on V-J Day, Aug. 14, 1945.

Above: The 25 foot sculpture on the San Diego bayfront called "Unconditional Surrender." It is based on the famous photograph by Alfred Eisenstaedt featuring a soldier kissing a nurse on V-J Day, Aug. 14, 1945.

Kelly Bennett over at Voice of San Diego has been updating readers on new developments and opinions responding to Mayor Sanders'announcement that he will temporarily suspend funding for city public art projects.

She links to a new post by Lucas O'Connor, a self-described "progressive campaign consultant," who sees public art as a way to motivate communities to become involved in government.

I chimed in with some videos featuring artists whose work is in UCSD's Stuart Collection of public art. Hearing artists talk about their ideas behind public works, and how they hope to engage with the environment and community goes a long way towards understanding public art.

In thinking about the ongoing conversation, I was reminded of a These Days show we did back in 2007 about the 25-foot bayfront sculpture "Unconditional Surrender." That sculpture caused a debate about local public art and quality and who gets to decide what is good or bad public art.

The show starts off with art critic Robert Pincus talking about how "Unconditional Surrender" fails on an artistic level. He called it monstrous in an article he wrote in the U-T and reiterates that on the show.

Early on, Pincus talks about what public art can and should do in a community. The show goes on to include callers chiming in on what public art means to them.

Later in the show, we talked with Catherine Sass, who was the public art director for the Port of San Diego at that time, and Anthony Block, the then chairman of the Port of San Diego's Public Art Committee. They talk about the Port's process for selecting public art.

Even though the conversation is from 2007, it's very relevant to today's concerns about the value and purpose of public art in our community.

Who else is writing about this topic? Have I missed anyone? Let me know.

Better yet, leave a comment on what you think public art means to a community. Do you like seeing public art around San Diego? If so, why?

UPDATE: Kelly Davis, associate editor of San Diego CityBeat sent me a link to her coverage on this issue. Davis added via email: " I'm perplexed by the city's program. I mean, why put public art at a fire station? Like the council policy says, the piece needs to be located at a 'publicly accessible place' where residents can 'experience and participate in' the piece."

Comments

Avatar for user 'lucasoconnor'

lucasoconnor | October 6, 2010 at 5:40 p.m. ― 4 years ago

Part 2 got a little more overtly political, but I'm always impressed by the ability of public art projects to get people involved. It's a low barrier of entry, as everyone has an opinion about art and about what their community is about.

( | suggest removal )