skip to main content

Listen

Read

Watch

Schedules

Programs

Events

Give

Account

Donation Heart Ribbon

Egyptians In San Diego Revel in Mubarak’s Departure

Audio

Aired 2/11/11

The revolution in Egypt brings a spirit of celebration to Egyptians all over the world, including those who live in San Diego.

The fall of president Hosni Mubarak has lifted the spirits of Egyptians all over the world, including those who live in San Diego. You could see it by attending Friday prayers at the San Diego Islamic Center on Balboa Avenue.

Hanif Mohebi (seated) is the director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations in San Diego, and he is joined by a handful of Egyptian-Americans who expressed their joy at the ouster of Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak. They spoke at the Islamic Center of San Diego, February 11, 2011.
Enlarge this image

Above: Hanif Mohebi (seated) is the director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations in San Diego, and he is joined by a handful of Egyptian-Americans who expressed their joy at the ouster of Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak. They spoke at the Islamic Center of San Diego, February 11, 2011.

Services brought out many Muslims who have family members in Egypt, and they spoke of the happiness they felt upon hearing the news that Mubarak was really done. Marwa Abdalla said Friday's news left her feeling overjoyed, and it happened as her mother and sister-in-law, who live in Cairo, were paying a visit.

"It just so happened that they're here when this revolution broke out,” she said. “So I ran to the bedroom they were sleeping in and said, ‘Mom, sister, wake up! You won't believe what happened!’"

Most of the Egyptians said that they, or their parents, moved to the U.S. to escape oppression and corruption in Egypt. Some said hope for the future of the country might cause them to move back to help create a democracy. Khaled El Henawy said the Egyptian revolution should show the United States it must support free Arab societies.

“The U.S. foreign policy for the last 30 years is to control and stabilize the Middle East, rather than fighting for the right causes, which is promoting democracy,” he said.

El Henawy said Egypt's challenge is to turn power over to a new civilian government, chosen in honest elections. Most said they were glad the army had taken control of the government, provided that power would revert to civilian control as soon as possible.

Earlier Friday, on a special edition of the KPBS radio program "These Days," Dr. Sameh Ali, Assistant Professor of Medicine at UCSD, said he is confident the Egyptian military will guide the country toward democratic elections.

"I think the past 20 days or so has indicated that the power is in the hands of the people and the military surely understands this," he said.

Gada Osman, director of the Center for Islamic and Arabic Studies at San Diego State University, noted Egypt's history of the military taking over when it was supposed to transition to civilian rule.

"In 1952, there was a military coup that ousted the king and put the military in power and at the time there was the idea that this would only be transitional and military rule has existed since then," Osman told our radio audience.

"However, I do think this is very different. I think just the difference between what happened yesterday and what happened today points to the power of the people and the power that is now understood to belong to the people, so that no matter what the regime tries to do, the popular uprising really does have the ability to shift that."

Comments

Avatar for user 'Greg Duch'

Greg Duch | February 20, 2011 at 8:22 p.m. ― 3 years, 5 months ago

MUBARAK'S FALL IS A POTENIAL DISASTER. HE WAS NO JOHN LOCKE. HÉ WAS A UNWAVERING GUARANTOR OF PEACE W/ISRAEL. HE RÉSTRAINED HAMAS IN GAZA. -IMAGE- GAZA INDEPENDENT UNDER HAMAS

( | suggest removal )

Avatar for user 'Greg Duch'

Greg Duch | February 22, 2011 at 2:10 p.m. ― 3 years, 5 months ago

I admire the democratic aspirations of Egyptians and Egyptian emigres.
I also cheered the demise of the Shah of Iran in 1979, as did millions of others, both Iranians and others. Is Iran better off today under AYATOLLAH Khameini and Achmadinajad, than under the Shah??? There were so many imponderables back in 1979, that democracy really never had a nickel's worth of a chance to take root in a nation/civilization ( PERSIA) which had been in existence for 5,000 years. Throughout those millenia, rule was by a strong-fisted autocrat, or by foreign occupiers. The similarities with Egypt are just too great. AND the risks are enormous. Egypt is descended from another ancient civilization, which has contributed much to the cultural and educational progress of all the world. But from the days of the pharoahs, King Tut, Cleopatra, through the foreign conquests, to its own monarchy under King Farouk, to Colonel Abdul Nasser's coup in 1952, to Mubarak, Egypt has averted any experience with pluralist democracy over the several millenia of its existence as a learned civilization. The US has pretty good leverage which it uses to topple leaders of foreign governments in the Third World. Where it has failed is in creating ready-to-go, takeout democratic institutions where there never were any*. (*SEE: Viet Nam, Pakistan, Iraq, Afghanistan, KUWAIT, Burma, SAUDI ARABIA). Not to mention our country's warm embrace of Chinese totalitarian/pseudo-capitalist rule for over 60 years; of a nation counting 1.5 billion people. How ironic that some of the most ancient civilizations on earth: China; Persia/Iran; Iraq/Babylon; (AS)Syria; Egypt have contributed so much to global culture, science, and history; yet have remained foreigners to the Western concept of pluralistic democracy. As with Iran, BE CAREFUL OF WHAT YOU ASK FOR
IN EGYPT, YOU MAY BE CATASTOPHICALLY SURPRISED.

( | suggest removal )