Appeals Court Strikes Down California Election Law
Wednesday, June 18, 2014
We're sorry. This audio clip is no longer available. A transcript for audioclip 22169 has been made available.
Chula Vista Citizen's For Jobs v. Donna Norris
The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals issued a divided opinion Monday on whether ballot initiative sponsors are entitled to anonymity on the petitions they circulate to gather signatures.
To view PDF files, download Acrobat Reader.
SAN FRANCISCO — A divided federal appeals court panel has overturned a California election law requiring sponsors of ballot initiatives to identify themselves on the petitions they circulate for signatures.
The appeals court cited two U.S. Supreme Court rulings that overturned Colorado's requirement that signature gatherers wear badges and an Ohio law banning anonymous campaign leaflets.
The court said anonymity protects speakers from harassment and focuses voters on the issues rather than personalities.
Judge Susan Graber dissented from the three-judge panel. Graber said requiring identification helps voters make better informed choices as they make split-second decisions on whether to sign a petition asking to qualify a measure for the ballot.
Glenn Smith, Professor of Constitutional Law, California Western School of Law said James Bopp's, an attorney for the plaintiffs, involvement in the case raises it's profile.
"People are wondering what's the bigger agenda here," Smith said.
Bopp is considered the architect behind the landmark Citizen's United ruling.
To view PDF documents, Download Acrobat Reader.