Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Available On Air Stations
Watch Live

Arts & Culture

FRONTLINE: The Real CSI

Joanna Grivetti, crime scene investigator in the homicide division of the Richmond, California, police department, inspects a vehicle in which a young man was shot in the back of the head during a drive-by shooting on March 9, 2012.
Courtesy of FRONTLINE
Joanna Grivetti, crime scene investigator in the homicide division of the Richmond, California, police department, inspects a vehicle in which a young man was shot in the back of the head during a drive-by shooting on March 9, 2012.

Airs Tuesday, July 16, 2013 at 10 p.m. on KPBS TV

From the courtroom to the living room (thanks to the hit television series “CSI”), forensic science is king. Expertise on fingerprints, ballistics and bite mark analysis are routinely called on to solve the most difficult criminal cases — and to put the guilty behind bars. But how reliable is the science behind forensics?

A FRONTLINE investigation finds serious flaws in some of the best-known tools of forensic science and wide inconsistencies in how forensic evidence is presented in the courtroom.

From the sensational murder trial of Casey Anthony and the FBI’s botched investigation of the Madrid terrorist bombing to capital cases in rural Mississippi, FRONTLINE documents how a field with few uniform standards and unproven science can undermine the search for justice.

Advertisement

As part of the investigative series “Post Mortem,” correspondent Lowell Bergman reports in a joint investigation with ProPublica and the Investigative Reporting Program at UC Berkeley.

This episode originally aired in 2012.

FRONTLINE is on Facebook, and follow @frontlinepbs on Twitter.

Your browser does not support this object. Content can be viewed at actual source page: http://video.kpbs.org/video/2212846559

Watch The Real CSI Preview on PBS. See more from FRONTLINE.

How reliable is the science behind forensics? FRONTLINE finds serious flaws in some of the best-known tools of forensic science and wide inconsistencies in how forensic evidence is presented in the courtroom.

Your browser does not support this object. Content can be viewed at actual source page: http://video.kpbs.org/video/2222959880

Watch The Fingerprint Examiner's Achilles Heel on PBS. See more from FRONTLINE.

In 2004, cognitive neoroscientist Itiel Dror set out to examine whether the process of fingerprint analysis, long considered one of the most reliable forms of forensic science, can be biased by the knowledge examiners have when they attempt to find a match for prints from a crime scene. In the clip above from the film "The Real CSI," FRONTLINE correspondent Lowell Bergman explains the way Dror constructed an experiment using the case of Brandon Mayfield.

You've Never Seen This on 'CSI'

Advertisement

"With no access to refrigeration and no funding for a burial

Your browser does not support this object. Content can be viewed at actual source page: http://video.kpbs.org/video/1774485437

Watch Post Mortem on PBS. See more from FRONTLINE.

In "Post Mortem," FRONTLINE correspondent Lowell Bergman reports the results of a joint investigation with ProPublica, NPR, and the Investigative Reporting Program at UC Berkeley.