Listen

Read

Watch

Schedules

Programs

Events

Give

Account

Donation Heart Ribbon

Plenty Of Ways Filner Recall Could Fail

Evening Edition

Aired 8/14/13 on KPBS News.

Never in San Diego's history has a mayoral recall seemed more possible. Yet experts say it will still be an extremely daunting feat.

Never in San Diego's history has a mayoral recall seemed more possible. Yet experts say it will still be an extremely daunting feat.

Even if the 101,597 signatures needed to put the recall of Mayor Bob Filner on the ballot can be gathered in 39 days, archaic city laws could help Filner or his supporters challenge the recall in court. And for a recall to make it to the ballot, thousands of volunteers need to be recruited and hundreds of thousands of dollars need to be raised, all under the backdrop of what seems to be, until recently, a disorganized recall campaign.

Special Feature Read the Backstory

All of the accusations, statements and apologies from the key players in the developing story about allegations of sexual harassment in Mayor Bob Filner's office and calls from former mayoral supporters for his resignation.

Still, recall organizers said the ill will toward Filner is so strong that they can pull it off.

"The notion that he was willing to violate women under his control, I think at a very deep level affects all of us, and we just want to see him gone," said April Boling, the recall campaign's treasurer. "Men like that should not be awarded by being able to stay where they want to be."

Filner's office did not respond to requests for comment on the recall movement, however his lawyers sent out an official response to the recall effort.

"Now is not the time to go backwards — back to the time when middle-class jobs and neighborhood infrastructure were sacrificed to Downtown special interests," it read. "We need to continue to move forward!"

San Diego Mesa College political professor Carl Luna said recall is the only way to remove Filner from office, short of criminal indictment.

With Filner refusing to resign, “this is probably the best chance you've had for mayoral recall since Dick Murphy was mayor,” Luna said. Murphy resigned in 2005 under the threat of recall.

Recall's Daunting Barriers

Six mayoral recalls have been attempted in San Diego's history, but none collected enough signatures to make it to the ballot, according to the San Diego City Clerk. In fact, of the 46 attempted recalls in San Diego's history, only four succeeded. A 1990 effort against City Councilwoman Linda Bernhardt was organized by Republican land use consultant Michael Pallamary, who is also spearheading the current recall Filner effort. Three school board members were also recalled in 1918. (Another recall effort against Filner was attempted in 1989 when he was on the the city council, but the city clerk does not know who led it.)

Document

History of San Diego Recalls

History of San Diego Recalls

Download .DOC

Those successful recall efforts were not citywide, so they needed fewer than 10,000 signatures to get on the ballot but still had 39 days to gather them. While the Proposition B campaign gathered 116,000 signatures to put pension reform on the ballot, it had six months to do it.

Deputy City Attorney Sharon Spivak said recall organizers really need more than 101,597 signatures to bring the recall to a vote. She estimated gatherers will need about 140,000 signatures because some signers won't be registered San Diego voters, will sign incorrectly or could even sign fake names to throw off the recall.

Gathering enough qualified signatures isn’t the only obstacle to recalling Filner.

Consider San Diego's archaic recall laws; The city has a law on its books that says signature gatherers can only be registered San Diego voters, despite a 1999 U.S. Supreme Court case that "made it very clear that you can't require someone who's gathering signatures to be either a voter or a resident," Spivak said.

Because the law has already been found unconstitutional, the city attorney won't enforce it, Spivak said. In fact, the same requirement was removed from city laws governing signatures for ballot initiatives and referendums, but "somehow it was not removed from the recall section," she said.

Deputy City Attorney Sharon Spivak talks in the city attorney's offices about the recall laws.

Document

San Diego Recall Procedure

San Diego Recall Procedure

Download .PDF

Although the city attorney won’t enforce these laws, Spivak said Filner supporters could use them to challenge the recall in court.

"If you had a law on the books and someone said that the votes should be counted that way, someone can always run to court and have it interpreted,” she said. “But I'm very comfortable based on the case law that that argument would not win."

If enough signatures are gathered, the recall ballot would have two questions: Should Filner be recalled and if so, who should replace him? San Diego has another law on the books that voters must answer the first question for their vote on the second to count.

But this recall law matches a state law that was declared unconstitutional in 2003.

"So we've known for 10 years that our local law was likely unconstitutional and for whatever reason, it was never cleaned up," said City Councilman Mark Kersey.

That means if the recall succeeded, "it would be very easy for someone to sue the city and we would in all likelihood lose, and possibly be on the hook for attorney's fees," he said.

Kersey wrote a memo to City Council President Todd Gloria suggesting the council vote on changing the law about the recall ballot. He said the council will likely take up the issue at a special Aug. 28 meeting and could pass an emergency ordinance that would change city law immediately. That means the change would be made before the recall election.

Spivak said she doesn’t recommend the council change the law about signature gatherers in the middle of the signature collection process. She said the city attorney will not enforce either dubious recall law.

"We are very comfortable with that position because it tracks case law," she said.

Grassroots Recall Campaign

By all accounts, the Recall Bob Filner team came together in strange fashion. Pallamary started a "Recall Bob Filner" Facebook page in June before the first sexual harassment allegations were made. A self-described "homemaker," Elisa Brent, started a recallbob.com website July 15.

While Brent and Pallamary were gathering support, Stampp Corbin, LGBT Weekly's publisher, issued a notice to recall Filner. Corbin's move led to questions about whether he was actually a Filner supporter attempting to derail the recall effort.

LGBT Weekly publisher Stampp Corbin stands in his publication's offices. Covers of LGBT Weekly decorate the wall behind him.

Corbin dismissed the claims and has since combined his recall effort with Pallamary's, but it’s clear there is still some amount of discord among the recall leaders.

On Tuesday night, Brent resigned as co-chairwoman of the recall effort due to what she called "complete breakdown in communication between me and Michael Pallamary."

In an interview with KPBS, Corbin said he and his co-organizers have different approaches to carrying out the recall.

"I just want San Diego voters' voices to be heard, whether they favor the recall or not, but others want to make the recall more about them," Corbin said. He would not elaborate on what he meant, but complained that while he has a plan to gather enough signatures for the recall in just four days, other members of the team want to stretch out the process, costing more money and time.

He wouldn’t disclose what his plan is.

"Consultants overstep their bounds," he said. "I'm a Harvard MBA. You don't get to tell me what I'm going to do in my company. That's why you're called a consultant."

In addition to gathering volunteers, looking for financial backing and holding rallies, Pallamary said his voicemail fills up daily with media requests.

"Right now I am running around like a headless chicken," he wrote in an Aug. 5 email.

Last week, a group of mostly Republican political experts joined the team, which Filner opponents hope will steady the recall ship. The new lineup includes Boling, Carl DeMaio's campaign treasurer who also helped run signature gathering for Proposition B; John Hoy, a campaign consultant for City Councilwoman Lorie Zapf and City Attorney Jan Goldsmith; Rachel Laing, the communications director for Filner's former campaign consultant; and Jean Freelove, a longtime Republican fundraiser.

Boling said she and Hoy first offered to help and then brought in Laing and Freelove. She said her reasons for joining the recall are personal but that she waited to get involved until specific accusations were made against Filner.

"That man really is just not fit to be in office," she said. "The things that he has done to betray not only the office but the women who have come to him for help, to use that kind of position of power to do what he did is disgusting and I don't think he should be mayor."

Boling said signature gathering for Proposition B cost about $700,000. The cost of recall signature gathering depends on how many volunteer, she said.

If all signature gatherers are volunteers, the campaign could cost $200,000, which would pay for postage, validating signatures and printing the petitions, she said. If the campaign has to hire signature gatherers it could cost about $600,000. Corbin added that the consultants also charge a fee, but wouldn’t say how much.

April Boling, the treasurer of the Recall Bob Filner campaign, talks in her office.

Boling said they want 4,000 volunteers to gather signatures and have 2,000 signed up already. She added the campaign will advocate a “mail-in program,” asking residents to send them self-addressed, stamped envelopes, which recall organizers will return with petitions.

To pay for all of this, Boling said the campaign has "some people who have made some commitments to us," but declined to say who those people are. She added that the recall campaign does not yet have their checks in hand.

The Recall Mayor Filner campaign officially registered with the city clerk on July 30 and can collect contributions in unlimited amounts. It will have to disclose all its donors.

On Monday, Pallamary said he was recently “contacted by a very large group” that wants to provide volunteers, and that he has begun collecting donations, mostly in small amounts between $100 and $200. He added that the campaign has consolidated onto one website. The website was registered in January 2013 using a proxy that hides the name of the person who set it up.

Laing said a web developer registered the website and offered it to the recall campaign last week at face value. She said because the developer is not political, he does not want his name made public.

Pallamary confirmed last week that recall organizers met with investor and philanthropist Fred Applegate, but said the meeting was not a fundraiser. Applegate told KPBS he "has no comments on anything."

What Happens Next

Recall organizers have from Aug. 18 to Sept. 26 to gather signatures. They would then present their petition to the city clerk for certification, a process that can take up to 30 days. If the clerk determines enough signatures are valid, the city council would call a special election within 60 to 90 days. That means the recall vote likely wouldn’t be held until January or February.

Instead of the usual San Diego election format, which involves a primary and then general election, a recall would only have one round of voting. Whoever earns the most votes—even if it's as low as 10 percent of the total voters—would be the next mayor.

The San Diego County Democratic Party has said it's against a recall, possibly strategizing that the recall election format would favor Republicans. The local Republican Party supports a recall. Chair Tony Krvaric told Voice of San Diego that while San Diego's Republican party won't financially back the effort, it will encourage its members to volunteer.

Even if the recall effort overcomes the many obstacles in its path—an almost impossibly short time frame to collect signatures, convoluted and archaic election laws and the disorganization of a grassroots campaign—there could still be one more thing standing in its way: If the recall makes its way onto the ballot, voters still have to agree that Filner should be removed from office. And the long time frame could work against momentum, said political professor Luna.

"It's sometime between Thanksgiving and New Year's before you're going to end up having an actual vote on this," he said. "Question is, will ‘Filner Fatigue’ have set in by then, or will the mayor be able to ride it out?"

This story was a collaboration between KPBS and its partner inewsource.

Comments

Avatar for user 'Peking_Duck_SD'

Peking_Duck_SD | August 14, 2013 at 7:42 a.m. ― 8 months, 1 week ago

I won't sign, as I've said numerous times.

It's partisan, it's sloppy, it's controversial, it's secretive, and it has poor odds at success.

It is actually a major reason Mr. Filner is not stepping down.

Why would he now?

A recall effort that looks like he will survive - of course his advisors are telling him to persist.

I've said it once and will repeat it here : this recall is helping Filner stay in power. It's a gift to the Filner camp.

( | suggest removal )

Avatar for user 'benz72'

benz72 | August 14, 2013 at 8:30 a.m. ― 8 months, 1 week ago

I don't find Filner's actions acceptable in a leader and I don't want him to represent me. Even Marion Barry was just a crackhead and only damaged himself, Filner is abusing others. Not excusable, get out!

( | suggest removal )

Avatar for user 'thompsonrichard'

thompsonrichard | August 14, 2013 at 9:47 a.m. ― 8 months, 1 week ago

King Solomon in the Bible had many, many wives and the Song of Songs may suggest why.
"The greater the man, the greater his evil inclination" [In the Talmud, the term "evil inclination" (yetzer hara) is often used to mean the libido]. King Solomon didn't live as long as Methuselah.
Strom Thurmond was the first man to reach his 100th birthday while in the U.S. Senate. Strom married his first wife, Jean, on Nov. 7, 1947, after she graduated college. Thurmond then hired her as his personal secretary. Thurmond was a judge in the pageant in which she had won the Miss South Carolina of 1947 Crown. There was no issue from this marriage.
Jean having died of natural causes, Strom Thurmond married his second wife, Nancy, another Miss South Carolina (of 1965), on December 22, 1968. He was 66 years old and she was 22. She had been working in his Senate office off and on for almost a year. At age 68, Thurmond fathered what was believed to be his first child. He had three other children with Nancy. Sixth months after the death of Thurmond, Essie Mae Washington-Williams grudgingly revealed that she was his daughter. She's a retired L.A. Unified teacher, and she identifies as African American. She was born on October 12, 1925, to a girl who had reached 16 years of age, and who was working for the Thurmond family when Strom, then 23, impregnated her. She did not reveal she was Strom's daughter during his lifetime because it "wasn't to the advantage of either one of us." After Essie Mae came forward, the Thurmond family publicly acknowledged her. And she then joined the DAR & the United Daughters of the Confederacy.
So far, cartoonist Steve Breen hasn't vowed -- in his continuing U-T biopics -- to not show Bob Filner in bed with a prostitute. J. Edgar Hoover was convinced that Martin Luther King Jr. had a super-sized libido. I attended the rally. And I couldn't and can't see why the votes of almost a quarter-million Filner votes should be overturned. Both Bob and Martin did time: Mississippi State Pen and Birmingham Jail, respectively. But neither stint was for "violated women under their control."

( | suggest removal )

Avatar for user 'TheDiegan'

TheDiegan | August 14, 2013 at 10:36 a.m. ― 8 months, 1 week ago

First: as an elected member of the Party the mayor should be entitled to stay in office. Second: the Party's Central Committee met secretly two times yielding only mild requests to the Mayor, *not* orders that the mayor obey the Committee. So: Party officials have shown restraint; we should all be in agreement that what the Party wants ought to be what matters.

( | suggest removal )

Avatar for user 'DeLaRick'

DeLaRick | August 14, 2013 at 11:40 a.m. ― 8 months, 1 week ago

"'So we've known for 10 years that our local law was likely unconstitutional and for whatever reason, it was never cleaned up,' said City Councilman Mark Kersey."

I hope our do-nothing political hacks have amended regulations and policies to ensure this type of situation is dealt with swiftly and efficiently in the future.

We're lookin' at you too monsieur Goldsmith. No legally-enforceable procedure for a recall is good ol' fashioned negligence.

( | suggest removal )

Avatar for user 'MarineRoom'

MarineRoom | August 14, 2013 at 12:08 p.m. ― 8 months, 1 week ago

Thank you for a good example of a straw man argument.

( | suggest removal )

Avatar for user 'MarineRoom'

MarineRoom | August 14, 2013 at 12:10 p.m. ― 8 months, 1 week ago

My thanks were to The Diegan, of course.

( | suggest removal )

Avatar for user 'Pookster1'

Pookster1 | August 15, 2013 at 3:57 p.m. ― 8 months, 1 week ago

I am certain the Papa Doug Mafia and Cronies are wringing their hands and salivating just about now. Business returning to usual down at at City Hall. Sounds like a country song in the making!

( | suggest removal )

Avatar for user 'CarlosDangler'

CarlosDangler | August 16, 2013 at 9:15 p.m. ― 8 months ago

There are people who would love to disrupt the recall with disinformation campaign in an attempt to minimize the number of signatures gathered.

The 'recall' and signature gathering effort is a means to an end to remove Filner from office just as 'resignation' is a means to the same end. The 'recall' effort has a tight timeline and serves as the Plan B backup vehicle should Bob Filner choose NOT to resign, the path he has chosen thus far.

A valid argument as to why signing on for recall is not a good thing has not been made. This is the 'red' flag. Don't let misinformation dupe you in keeping Bob Filner in the Mayor's Office.

Stay Classy San Diego

( | suggest removal )

Avatar for user 'DonWood'

DonWood | August 18, 2013 at 6:30 p.m. ― 8 months ago

When these new recall leaders 'volunteered" to help run the recall campaign, there was no mention of their being paid any fees. But this piece says that hundreds of thousands must be collected by the recall campaign, in part to pay their consulting fees. Just how much in fees do Boling and her fellow "volunteers" plan to collect from this campaign? Facts please.

( | suggest removal )

Avatar for user 'DonWood'

DonWood | August 18, 2013 at 6:35 p.m. ― 8 months ago

Also, if the recall signature gathering has already begun under the existing city recall ordinance, which the city says is unconstitutional, and the city charter changes the recall ordinance on August 24 to make it constitutional, Does the recall campaign need to throw all the recall petitions it has collected up to August 24 in the trash and start the recall all over, including registering their intent to run a recall in the media and with the city clerk? If they try to use the petitions they collected before August 24 when they turn in their signature, is that action subject to legal action, since the portion of petitions collected before August 24 would be illegal?

( | suggest removal )

Forgot your password?