skip to main content









Donation Heart Ribbon

City Council Not On Board With Filner’s Proposed City Attorney Cuts

Aired 5/9/13 on KPBS News.

A proposed $1.4 million spending reduction in the office of San Diego City Attorney Jan Goldsmith failed to find broad support on the City Council today during a review of Mayor Bob Filner's budget proposal.

A proposed $1.4 million spending reduction in the office of San Diego City Attorney Jan Goldsmith failed to find broad support on the City Council today during a review of Mayor Bob Filner's budget proposal.

Special Feature San Diego's Next Budget

Everything you need to follow the news and understand what's in the city of San Diego's fiscal 2016 budget.

The planned cuts in the department run by the mayor's political rival, which would go into effect in the fiscal year that begins July 1, involve the equivalent of 13 jobs.

The office conducts misdemeanor criminal prosecutions, handles litigation on behalf of the city, and provides legal advice to municipal officials.

Goldsmith said the reductions could mean he would have to take more cases to outside legal counsel at greater expense to the city. The City Council has directed that as many cases be handled in-house as possible.

"We're a bargain,'' Goldsmith said of his lawyers.

Council President Todd Gloria and Councilwoman Lorie Zapf said they opposed the reduction -- though no formal vote was taken.

"This is a pretty drastic cut,'' Zapf said. "We have a responsibility to protect the taxpayers' money, and stripping away our legal representation I think exposes us down the line to greater liability, and we'd have to pay for outside counsel anyway.''

City Financial Management Director Jeff Sturak said the mayor will consider all options when making revisions to his budget proposals later this month, but he was unlikely to eliminate the cut for the City Attorney's Office.

The mayor has said that the City Attorney's Office has avoided the belt-tightening faced by most city departments in recent years. Goldsmith countered that he had to cut $1.8 million when he took office in 2008.

The mayor's representatives denied allegations that the reductions targeted certain employees. Sturak said he has to enter employee numbers in the system while developing the budget, but he didn't know who they were.

It was "absolutely not the case'' that individual employees were targeted, said Francisco Estrada, the mayor's council representative.

Goldsmith said since his office is independent, he is the only one with the authority to determine how the $1.4 million will be implemented, not the mayor.

The City Council is in the midst of department-by-department reviews of the mayor's budget proposal. They also went over various administrative offices today, plus the city auditor, city clerk, personnel, treasurer and risk management.

Staff will work council member comments into a revised spending plan to be issued later this month. A vote to adopt the budget is scheduled to take place in June.

To view PDF documents, Download Acrobat Reader.


Avatar for user 'philosopher3000'

philosopher3000 | May 9, 2013 at 8:02 a.m. ― 3 years, 10 months ago

For far too long the City Attorney's office has been an opaque budget black hole. With the top public salaries in the City (other than the 'financial advisors' in charge of the pension funds), these over-paid public servants are in the wrong business. If they want to make money they need to go work in the private sector.

First, let's openly publish ALL the salaries in the Attorney's office (including ALL benefits), and their budget history. This will show how they have avoided the drastic (6%) cuts that all other departments suffered (like public safety ). There are plenty of out of work lawyers around the country who would love to move to San Diego and work for the City, even for a low base salary.

If we want to avoid budget cuts, we need to rase revenue. Ask Jan Goldsmith, Council President Todd Gloria and Councilwoman Lorie Zapf, as an ELECTED officials, where would they raise taxes to pay for his high budget expectations?

( | suggest removal )

Avatar for user 'Mmikey'

Mmikey | May 9, 2013 at 8:05 a.m. ― 3 years, 10 months ago

careful, all the smarmy lawyers that may be let go will end up in the scam ADA lawsuit business.

( | suggest removal )

Avatar for user 'CaliforniaDefender'

CaliforniaDefender | May 9, 2013 at 3:38 p.m. ― 3 years, 10 months ago

Just another indication of how out of touch Filner is with city staff, the City Council, and people of San Diego.

I think many of his supporters are starting to realize their mistake.

2016 can't come soon enough. Who knows, perhaps the people will get fed up with Filner's unproductive behavior and impeach him before then.

( | suggest removal )