skip to main content

Listen

Read

Watch

Schedules

Programs

Events

Give

Account

Donation Heart Ribbon

How Similar Is Obamacare To Medicare?

Aired 10/1/13 on KPBS News.

Open enrollment for health coverage under the federal health law starts Tuesday. We’ll look at how the roll out of the Affordable Care Act compares to the last time the federal government made coverage available to millions.

Special Feature Second Opinion

Ever since the Affordable Care Act passed, health policy makers have been comparing it to another moment in history — Medicare.

It’s been almost 50 years since President Lyndon Johnson signed Medicare into law. And under the law, almost 19 million people aged 65 and older had new medical coverage.

"Half the aged did not have health insurance coverage, and the half that did have health insurance coverage had very poor coverage," said Dorothy Rice, who was a director of health insurance research at the Social Security Administration when Medicare was created. She’s now 91 years old.

“We were all told in the social security administration that we should come to work on that weekend when Medicare went into effect because we were going to have the doors knocked down by all these elderly sick people," Rice said. "And you know what happened? Nothing. Absolutely nothing.”

Rice said Medicare started smoothly — there were no implementation delays. She said enrolling in Medicare was simple. Eligible people were automatically signed up for hospital care. And to elect medical coverage, they signed a pre-printed card they received in the mail. Rice said the new federal law will not be that simple.

“Now that individual has to sign up, choose a plan, the best plan that they can get for the amount of money they’re willing to pay. And if they don’t sign up, they’ll be penalized.”

Enrollment may be more complex than early Medicare, but Rice and others say, it’s crucial that everyone signs up if the new system is to work properly.

“Imagine if everybody simply waited until their house caught on fire then called up the insurance company and said you must sell me an insurance policy right now," said Jonathan Engel, professor at Baruch College. He wrote a book about the history of Medicaid.

“Clearly the insurance company's going to go out of business in three minutes, right? You can’t just insure houses that are already on fire," Engel explained. "You have to have people buying in before their house catches on fire."

Engel said this national health overhaul has other challenges. Medicare overcame initial opposition from physicians, but the resistance to the Affordable Care Act is unprecedented.

"I think we’re at almost a unique moment in our political history, the level of divisiveness and anger and hatred and distrust between the two ends of the political spectrum. This is not where a lot of us are trying to get together to do something difficult. This is where we have some people who are actively trying to make something that would naturally be difficult become more difficult."

Engel said people are largely uninformed, and are being given misinformation about the law. He said the sheer complexity of the health exchanges is enough to scare people away too.

Buying health insurance is complicated, even for highly informed, sophisticated people. And for someone who isn’t used to having health insurance, trying to figure out bronze, deductibles, these are complicated problems.

But Engel said it will take years to evaluate the success of the new program. Dorothy Rice said California’s implementation of the law may go more smoothly, because of the state’s rigorous efforts. But she hopes eventually the national health care system will look more like Medicare.

"We were sure that when Medicare was enacted, it wouldn’t be long until we would have national health insurance but that never came to being until the 2010 Affordable Care Act," Rice said.

The open enrollment period begins Oct. 1, and lasts through March 31, 2014.

Comments

Avatar for user 'News619'

News619 | October 1, 2013 at 2:06 p.m. ― 1 year, 2 months ago

Becoming ill and disabled I had to sign up for Medicare & Medi-Cal. Professional help made that the easy part. What was tough was the head spinning complexities of coverage, benefits, who to access, how to access, changes and more, all while ill and trying to heal.
When Obama's Health Care Act first passed, Insurance companies began offering a few policies, (beginning the Insurance Exchange model) and I enrolled in one. While still complex, I have more help and better clarity as to my benefits and how to access them. It's truly the next best thing to the "Single-payer" model. As this is a dynamic and changeable process, I see Medicare, Medicaid & "Obamacare" becoming more and more similar to so that one day all the fragmented health care programs may merge into one hopefully much more efficient group.
This is a huge long process, the idea which most ALL politicians, (except Clinton & Obama) have been paying "lip service" to for at least the past forty years. It's not complete, that will take years; but I'm confident all Americans as a whole will be much better off. Shame on those who sabotage by constantly fighting against such a goal without providing any alternative leadership. I will NOT be dragged back into the dark ages they envision! Be patient, be engaged and we will all benefit.

( | suggest removal )

Avatar for user 'Peking_Duck_SD'

Peking_Duck_SD | October 1, 2013 at 11:10 p.m. ― 1 year, 2 months ago

Single payer is better, but Republicans threw a fit over the suggestion of expanding Medicare to more people, which is what I favor.

Medicare for all citizens, and let the insurance companies operate in "upgrades" for companies who want to offer employees all the extra bells and whistles to lure the best employees (or the rich who want to buy Cadillac plans).

But give ALL citizens basic access through Medicare expansion.

( | suggest removal )