Underage Drinking Debate: Why Both Sides Agree More Than Not
Tuesday, August 28, 2007
Tom Fudge: The legal drinking age in California and around the country is 21. It hasn't always been that way. In the 1970s, many states lowered their drinking age to 18. The idea was that if young men could be conscripted into the Vietnam War, they should be able to have a drink too. But lobbying groups like Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD) established a 21-year-old drinking age nationwide in 1988. States risked losing their federal highway funds if they didn't comply.
Today, the idea of lowering the drinking age is being raised anew. Like in the 70s, some people say that young men serving in Iraq should be allowed to have a beer. Others argue the higher drinking age has never caused teenagers to drink less or made them safer behind the wheel of a car.
- Barrett Seaman , author of Binge: Campus Life in an Age of Disconnection and Excess , and member of the board of Choose Responsibility -- a non-profit organization which opposes the current minimum drinking age requirements.
executive director of MADD (Mothers Against Drunk Driving) San Diego County, who agrees with the current minimum drinking age requirements.
Please stay on topic and be as concise as possible. Leaving a comment means you agree to our Community Discussion Rules. We like civilized discourse. We don't like spam, lying, profanity, harassment or personal attacks.