skip to main content

Listen

Read

Watch

Schedules

Programs

Events

Give

Account

Donation Heart Ribbon

Should Calif. Change Sex Predator Laws?

Video unavailable. Read transcript below.

Video published March 5, 2010 | Download MP4 | View transcript

Above: San Diego remains shaken by the rape and murder of Poway teenager Chelsea King. We discuss the details of the case, and how it could impact California's sex offender laws in the future.

GLORIA PENNER (Host): San Diego remains shaken by the rape and murder of Poway teenager Chelsea King. At his arraignment on Wednesday, John Albert Gardner III was accused of the killing and pleaded not guilty. He is a registered sex offender. After the arraignment, San Diego District Attorney Bonnie Dumanis had this to say.

BONNIE DUMANIS (San Diego District Attorney): We know this has rocked San Diego. It has rocked all of us. And, as we move forward, we need to move forward and wrap our arms around this family. And, begin the process of bringing this defendant through the justice system, and holding him accountable for the death of Chelsea.

PENNER: KPBS reporter Amita Sharma is covering the story and joins me now to give some detail. So, Amita, what are the specific charges that John Albert Gardner III is facing?

AMITA SHARMA (KPBS News): John Gardner is charged with murder as well as the special allegation of murder while committing or attempting to commit rape. It’s that last allegation that gives prosecutors the option of pursuing the death penalty against him. They can also ask for life without parole if he is tried and convicted. There are some deliberations that need to take place within the DA’s office before a decision is made. Chelsea King’s family will be consulted. An informal, unscientific poll of local lawyers regarding this case, they say this is a slam-dunk death penalty case.

PENNER: Slam-dunk death penalty. So what was the mood like in the courtroom during the arraignment?

SHARMA: Heavy, very quiet. The sadness, the grief of Chelsea King’s family, of this community was palpable inside that courtroom. The proceedings themselves went by very quickly. John Gardner’s public defender pleaded not guilty on his behalf. The only word that John Gardner uttered was the word “yes” when the judge asked him if he understood the upcoming court dates. Outside the courthouse there was anger. There were people protesting. There were people carrying signs basically asking for no leniency for molesters, no parole for molesters.

PENNER: So the emotion level is high. And he’s the only suspect in the case at this point, right?

SHARMA: That is true.

PENNER: How did the police identify him as the suspect?

SHARMA: John Gardner is a registered sex offender. His DNA – his semen – was found on an article of clothing of Chelsea King’s according to investigators.

PENNER: So you said he’s a registered sex offender, and of course that’s been much in the news. What was he previously convicted of?

SHARMA: Ten years ago, John Gardner pleaded guilty to committing a lewd act upon a child, in this case a thirteen-year-old girl, and false imprisonment. Those two offenses carry a maximum sentence of ten years in prison. He served five years of a six-year sentence. A psychiatrist who evaluated him at the time said that he should serve the maximum sentence because he had not taken responsibility for the crime, and that he would be a danger to underage girls in the community. However, another psychiatrist who was treating him for bipolar disorder said that he had shown remorse.

PENNER: Alright. Now, he is being investigated in the disappearance of Amber Dubois. What are some of the limitations that we’ve learned about regarding Megan’s Law, which does exist, that we’ve learned about as a result of this case?

SHARMA: Well Megan’s Law in effect creates a public registry of sex offenders. It requires these offenders to notify police when they’re released from prison and to alert them if they're going to move. In the case of John Gardner, on the Megan’s Law Web site he is listed as living in Lake Elsinore. In November of last year he was listed as living in Escondido. His mother, whom he visited, lives in Rancho Bernardo near the Rancho Bernardo community park where Chelsea’s body was found. So the limitation is this: we’re supposed to know where these sex offenders are living, but they are allowed to move freely and we don’t know where they are at any given time. Now, in California, there are about seven thousand sex offenders who have these GPS anklets on them. But not all of them send signals, and even those that do aren’t being scrutinized properly. So there are some defects here.

PENNER: Finally, Amita, we spoke to parents who live in the area. One of our reporters did. What did they say?

SHARMA: They are angry. They are frustrated. They feel like Megan’s Law, Jessica’s Law – which prevents sex offenders from living within 2,000 feet of a school or a park – are worthless. They are not protecting people’s children from crimes like this.

PENNER: Well thank you very much, Amita Sharma.

SHARMA: Thank you.

Comments

Avatar for user 'MSLGWCEO'

MSLGWCEO | March 6, 2010 at 8:22 a.m. ― 4 years, 5 months ago

Write all the laws you want. They will not prevent anyone from committing a crime, if they are determined to do so. In fact, the harsh laws encourage the killing of a victim, because dead people cannot testify. Unless there is some kind of evidence to direct investigators to the Perp. So, how do you tell who might be dangerous? While nothing is 100 percent in this world, we must concentrate on the most dangerous.

1. The VIOLENT offender.

2. The REPEAT offender.

3. The offender who DID NOT KNOW their victim.

If you notice. The vast majority of these most heinous sexual assaults, fall into 1 or all three categories. We are wasting all the resources on the low to no risk while the predators are hiding in the registry.

This is so simple and so to the point! When people say, "Well, we can't get rid of the register, what do you think we should do?" Answer, if we need a public register at all, and I truly don't think the public has proven that they can handle it, then the only ones on it should be those that fell into the categories above!

( | suggest removal )

Avatar for user 'MSLGWCEO'

MSLGWCEO | March 6, 2010 at 8:28 a.m. ― 4 years, 5 months ago

California has a HUGE amount of registered sex offenders. Punishing all of them for the acts of one individual does not make sense.

He and he alone should be punished. If found guilty, he and he alone should suffer the consequences of this murder.

That's suppose to be the American Justice system.

( | suggest removal )

Avatar for user 'jrenka'

jrenka | March 7, 2010 at 1:22 p.m. ― 4 years, 5 months ago

I agree with the first commentator in princible, but i see no reason to reduce the registry. Simply categorize the offenders. Then the system could follow the most worrysome as well.l
All but the mildest first offenders should have some GPS device. Most crimes and abductions can be narrowed by time and location and any GPSed criminal should be easy to identify, track and convict. The prospect of assured apprehension should deter at least some of these predators. And although it's of little consolation to that first victim of a repeating crime, at least they would be the last. One more removed from society!

( | suggest removal )