skip to main content

Listen

Read

Watch

Schedules

Programs

Events

Give

Account

Donation Heart Ribbon

Councilman Says City Code On Recall Elections Should Be Amended

SAN DIEGO (CNS) - Councilman Mark Kersey proposed Friday that a San Diego municipal code section on recall elections be amended to bring it into line with state law.

Special Feature Read the Backstory

All of the accusations, statements and apologies from the key players in the developing story about allegations of sexual harassment in Mayor Bob Filner's office and calls from former mayoral supporters for his resignation.

The City Council should discuss the issue at the next available meeting, since a recall effort against Mayor Bob Filner appears imminent, Kersey wrote in a memo to council President Todd Gloria, City Attorney Jan Goldsmith and City Clerk Elizabeth Maland.

Land-use consultant Michael Pallamary told reporters he will formally begin a recall campaign against the mayor, who faces sexual harassment allegations from at least seven women, if Filner fails to resign by Monday at 5 p.m.

Also, Stampp Corbin, the owner and publisher of LGBT Weekly, took out an advertisement in U-T San Diego to signal his intent to start a recall campaign.

Filner said Friday that, instead of resigning, he plans to take two weeks off to seek behavioral counseling.

Kersey said San Diego's code sections governing recall elections haven't been updated since 1989, and include language "nearly identical'' to a state law that was struck down in federal court in 2003.

The old state law said, "No vote cast in the recall election shall be counted for any candidate unless the voter also voted for or against the recall of the officer sought to be recalled,'' according to Kersey.

The San Diego code section says, "No vote cast for a candidate shall be counted unless the voter also voted on the recall question,'' Kersey said.

The councilman said striking down the state law means California voters can choose a candidate whether or not they vote on the recall issue itself.

Election attorneys believe the San Diego rule that disallows such flexibility for voters is unconstitutional, he said.

City Attorney Jan Goldsmith opined that the San Diego code section would not survive a legal challenge and should be repealed.

Pallamary, Corbin or any other party would need to collect about 102,000 valid signatures to qualify a recall election for a citywide ballot.

According to the city clerk's office, no citywide recall effort of a San Diego municipal government official has ever qualified for the ballot.

However, citywide petition campaigns to place initiatives on the ballot have been successful in the past.

Comments

Avatar for user 'Mmikey'

Mmikey | July 27, 2013 at 7:23 a.m. ― 1 year ago

amend it fast, while Filner is away/.

( | suggest removal )

Avatar for user 'Fess13'

Fess13 | July 27, 2013 at 8:38 a.m. ― 1 year ago

It would be nice if you had included why the state law was struck down in federal court in 2003. I'm sure there's a good reason, but it just isn't obvious to me. Bringing local law into line with changed state law seems like a really good idea to me, but the curious among us wonder, "Why?" the current wording was declared unconstitutional at the state level.

( | suggest removal )

Avatar for user 'RLA'

RLA | July 27, 2013 at 2:59 p.m. ― 1 year ago

Another point for Filner! Competing recall attempts and now Filner can stay in office while the recall works it's way to the California Supreme Court.

Perhaps the Dems should have thought this out before pushing this guy into office.

( | suggest removal )

Avatar for user 'RichardRider'

RichardRider | July 29, 2013 at 7:54 a.m. ― 1 year ago

There should be enough city council votes to override any mayoral veto at this point.

But the bigger problem is the threat of a bogus recall to short circuit a legitimate recall effort. A fake recall apparently can void a legit recall, as a failed effort blocks another attempt for 6 months, negating all the cost and signatures the legit effort provides.

( | suggest removal )

Avatar for user 'jckcomm'

jckcomm | July 29, 2013 at 8:50 a.m. ― 1 year ago

As a newcomer to the City of San Diego, I thought I was moving to a paradise that was free from petty scandals, and had that "dude" or laid back attitude. Well, I guess not. At any rate, the City Council and citizens should get rid of this guy ASAP, as he is an embarrassment and a fool, not to mention a drag on the Democratic Party. He is actually worse for the overall image of San Diego than "Ron Burgundy"

( | suggest removal )

Avatar for user 'MarineRoom'

MarineRoom | July 29, 2013 at 9:34 a.m. ― 1 year ago

The voters put Mr. Filner in the Mayor's office.

( | suggest removal )

Avatar for user 'MarineRoom'

MarineRoom | July 29, 2013 at 9:35 a.m. ― 1 year ago

By the way, my comment above was addressed to RLA.

( | suggest removal )