Listen

Read

Watch

Schedules

Programs

Events

Give

Account

Donation Heart Ribbon

Immigration Reform Gets One Step Closer To A Bill

From left, Sen. Jeff Flake, R-Ariz., Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-NY, Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., and Sen. Michael Bennett, D-Colo, arrive at a news conference after their tour of the Mexico border with the United States on Wednesday in Nogales, Ariz. The senators are part of the "Gang of Eight," a larger group of legislators collaborating for an immigration reform package.

A final deal on an immigration overhaul is at hand but still incomplete, according to two of the bipartisan "Gang of Eight" senators collaborating on it.

On NBC's Meet the Press on Sunday, Democratic Sen. Chuck Schumer of New York and Republican Sen. Jeff Flake of Arizona discussed a new agreement on a low-skilled worker program as a positive sign of progress, but both said there is more to be done.

That basic agreement was brokered Friday night between AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka and U.S. Chamber of Commerce chief Tom Donohue, clearing one of the last -- and perhaps largest -- hurdles between the Gang of Eight and a concrete immigration bill.

"We're much closer with labor and business agreeing on this guest-worker plan," Flake said. "But that doesn't mean we've crossed every 'I' or dotted every 'T' or vice versa."

The debate between the AFL-CIO and the Chamber had centered on wages for workers in the hotel, food service and construction industries, among others. "With the agreement between business and labor, every major policy issue has been resolved," Schumer said.

But Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida was more cautious with his optimism, as The Washington Post reports, calling the deal "premature."

"In order to succeed, this process cannot be rushed or done in secret," said Rubio in a statement issued on Sunday.

Over the weekend, Rubio also sent a letter to the chairman of the Judiciary Committee, Sen. Patrick Leahy of Vermont, asking that the committee take its time with the bill's markup.

The Associated Press cited an AFL-CIO fact sheet to describe the new "W" visa worker program, set to go into effect in April of 2015.

"In year one of the program, 20,000 workers would be allowed in; in year two, 35,000; in year three, 55,000; and in year four, 75,000. Ultimately the program would be capped at 200,000 workers a year, but the number of visas would fluctuate, depending on unemployment rates, job openings, employer demand and data collected by a new federal bureau pushed by the labor movement as an objective monitor of the market. One-third of all visas in any year would go to businesses with under 25 workers.

"A 'safety valve' would allow employers to exceed the cap if they can show need and pay premium wages, but any additional workers brought in would be subtracted from the following year's cap.

"The workers could move from employer to employer and would be able to petition for permanent residency after a year, and ultimately seek U.S. citizenship. Neither is possible for temporary workers now."

The senators are expected to present a bill the week of April 8.

Copyright 2013 NPR. To see more, visit www.npr.org.

Comments

Avatar for user 'Missionaccomplished'

Missionaccomplished | April 1, 2013 at 11:04 a.m. ― 1 year ago

They should take their time. Immigration lawyers as well as sociologists should be consulted--not just Big Labor and Big Business.

( | suggest removal )

Avatar for user 'Anon11'

Anon11 | April 1, 2013 at 11:39 a.m. ― 1 year ago

http://latino.foxnews.com/latino/news/2012/06/19/farmers-in-california-struggling-to-find-workers-to-help-with-crops/

(Yeah, I know... Fox news....)

Point being we can't get streamlined immigration reform in place fast enough. If history has taught us anything, it's that people resort to illegal immigration when the legal means are unreasonable and/or when the economies of the neighboring countries are imbalanced.

Our recession has had the secondary effect of lowering immigration, both legal and illegal. Why would you go through all the trouble if there's not enough of a financial incentive?

The real issue, though, is the speed and cost of legal immigration. If the process took less than 24 hours, and was free (or fees deferred and later added onto a tax), we would have WAY more legal immigrants, and the few "illegal" ones remaining would be more likely to be criminals.

When you give incentives to people to make them do something correctly, everyone wins. Don't think of short-term costs, think of long-term gains. Like any good business, you have to invest in the machine before you reap the profits.

Fair trade > Free trade

( | suggest removal )

Forgot your password?