Play Live Radio
Next Up:
Available On Air Stations
Watch Live


LGBTQ+ veterans sue Pentagon over so-called 'bad paper' discharges

A new federal lawsuit says the Pentagon should change the discharge paperwork of the tens of thousands of service members who were forced out of the military because of their sexuality.

Until 2011, service members forced out of the military due to their sexual orientation could find themselves with so-called “bad paper” discharges which in some cases resulted in them losing certain veterans benefits.

This year on Sept. 20, the anniversary of the 2011 repeal of the Clinton-era "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy, the Pentagon announced it will begin proactively upgrading the discharges of those separated under that policy. The suit, filed in the Northern District of California, insists it do more.


The military's ban didn't go away in 1994 when Don't Ask, Don't Tell became policy — it just meant the military couldn't ask a service member about their sexuality and a LGBTQ members had to stay in the closet. According to the Pentagon almost 33,000 service members were forced out over their sexuality between 1980 and 2011.

Elizabeth Kristen is one of the attorneys involved in the lawsuit. She says all veterans forced out under outdated and discriminatory policies should have their discharge papers fixed. When people leave the military, they're given a Form DD-214 which is required when applying for veterans benefits. Depending on when a person was separated under these policies, Kristen said, their form could including hurtful language.

"It says ... shocking things," Kristen said. "It says 'homosexual admission.' It says 'homosexual conduct.' It says 'attempt to engage in homosexual conduct,' (or) 'attempt to engage in same sex marriage.'"

Kristen said she's helped veterans upgrade discharges on a case-by-case basis but now believes this class-action lawsuit is the best remedy because most veterans who qualify either don't have the time or resources to file the necessary paperwork on their own.

Jules Sohn was a Marine officer who deployed to Iraq. She said she understood the rules when she received her commission in 1999.


"I could have my personal life and my Marine Corps life," Sohn said. "This (was) my idealistic self in my early 20s thinking I could do that."

Sohn left active duty in 2005 but was still on the rolls in the Inactive Ready Reserve. But when she came out and spoke publicly about the challenge of serving under Don't Ask, Don't Tell, the Marines launched an investigation. In 2008, she was kicked out.

While she received an honorable discharge, Sohn — who is a plaintiff in the suit — said being forced out still feels like a black mark on her record.

After a tour in Iraq in 2005 Sohn left active duty. She was approached by activists with the Servicemember’s Legal Defense Fund to talk about serving under the don’t ask don’t tell policy. She says her decision to share her story is what sparked an investigation into her, even though she was in the Inactive Ready Reserve.

Sohn was discharged in 2008. Although it was an honorable discharge, it was involuntary, which she sees as a black mark on her military record.

"How do you explain that to people?" Sohn said. "It's ... kind of awkward."

Melissa Johnson, an employment attorney in San Diego, enlisted in the Air Force when she was 17 years old — young enough that her parents had to sign an age waiver. It was the early 1980s and Johnson, a standout softball player, found herself stationed in England and traveling throughout Europe on an Air Force softball team.

"It would probably make me feel better about my military service. I think it would make a lot of veterans feel more satisfied with their military service and the way it ended.”
Melissa Johnson, military veteran

That's until a member of the team came under investigation for an unrelated crime and, according to Johnson, outed her teammates to investigators for leniency.

Johnson was 20 years old when she received a general discharge under honorable conditions — a status that stripped her of her G.I. Bill benefits. She said it was years before she was comfortable telling people she was a veteran.

"Probably for about 20 years I never even mentioned to anybody that I was in the service, ever," Johnson said. "People who are my best friends never knew I served. I think I just tucked it away. And because I tucked it away, even when I had the opportunity to petition to upgrade my discharge, I just never did — and I still haven't."

Johnson, who is now the president of the San Diego Bar Association, said it took years to recover from the trauma of her discharge. While she isn't involved in the lawsuit, she said fixing veterans' paperwork is the least the Pentagon can do.

"It would probably make me feel better about my military service," she said. "I think it would make a lot of veterans feel more satisfied with their military service and the way it ended.”

The legal team behind the suit said although it welcomes the Pentagon’s new initiative regarding these discharges the department has much more to do before every veteran impacted by its longtime ban receives justice.