skip to main content

Listen

Read

Watch

Schedules

Programs

Events

Give

Account

Donation Heart Ribbon

Editors Discuss Megan’s Law And County Elections

Video unavailable. Read transcript below.

Video published March 5, 2010 | Download MP4 | View transcript

Above: Editors discuss the impact of Megan's Law on the local community. Also, San Diego City Council member Donna Frye made news this week with the announcement that she will not run against Ron Roberts for a seat on the Board of Supervisors. We discuss the reasons behind Frye's decision, and how it could affect the makeup of the Board of Supervisors in the future.

GLORIA PENNER (Host): With me now to give their perspective on laws meant to protect our youth from sexual predators are Kent Davy, editor of the North County Times, and David Rolland, editor of San Diego CityBeat. Gentlemen, thank you for joining us. Kent, what's the good of laws like Jessica’s Law, which prohibits offenders from living near schools or parks, if those offenders can actually walk from their legally located homes to a park, or a jogging track, or a trail?

KENT DAVY (Editor, North County Times): Well I think that’ll be one of the questions as this wave of emotion because of this case continues to build and to sweep. Those will be the sorts of things that will come up, as legislatures jumping on the anti-crime bandwagon will say here, we’ve got to do something. And that’s one idea I think will come up. It’s also important to remember with Jessica’s Law that it’s not applied retroactively. It’s only those people who have been convicted since it went to effect in… I think you said earlier.

DAVID ROLLAND (Editor, San Diego CityBeat): 2006.

DAVY: 2006.

PENNER: Mm hmm. Kent mentioned, you know, a fact of legislatures jumping on the bandwagon. Is that what you think is going to happen? That state laws are going to be changed because of what happened here?

ROLLAND: It always happens. We had a rash of tough on crime measures throughout the 80’s and 90’s. And we are… the state of California in particular is feeling the effects of those in terms of it’s ongoing state budget crisis. It costs a lot of money to be that tough on crime. And I thing we ought to – whenever something like this happens people get very emotional, and I think there ought to be a time-out where we don’t respond to these things legislatively until everybody sort of calms down and we can take a look at whatever. You know, if there are holes in the system you take a rational approach to filling those holes rather than responding right away when we’re super emotional about it.

PENNER: Well the whole idea of changing laws. Will changing laws really change the potential that people are going to get attacked by people who are sex offenders?

DAVY: Well there's always… We live in a dangerous world. It’s finite, there is evil out there, and bad things do happen. You're never going to be able to make it a completely safe world. But you can certainly look at various systems and go oh, are they set up right? Do they make sense? Deficiencies in Megan’s Law for instance. Megan’s Law has got 63,000 offenders registered in California, but many of those people are not people who are likely to ever be recidivists. They are not high risk to anybody. It includes people all the way from the 18-year-old kid who managed to be intimate with a 15-year-old girl to people who are very violent.

PENNER: We only have a few seconds, but there is one school of thought that once you're a sex offender you're always going to be a sex offender and that you should be put away forever.

ROLLAND: Well that’s the type of generalization and overreaction that I'm talking about. You know, sex offenders are a lot of different people who commit very different types of crime. So you cannot paint them all with one brush.

PENNER: Ok. Well, this week also brought some attention-getting political news. San Diego City Council member Donna Frye will not run for Supervisor and will not challenge Supervisor Ron Roberts. David, CityBeat encouraged Donna Frye to run for Supervisor. You broke the story that she won’t run. What's the real reason that she won’t oppose Ron Roberts? I mean, you’ve got to have the inside track on this.

ROLLAND: Well, I can only tell you what she told me. And she held her cards close to the vest here. She said basically she really just wants to focus on finishing her term as a member of the San Diego City Council. You know, I suspect there’s a lot more involved. I know that her mother who is getting on in years lives with her. I think there may be family concerns. I also know that being on the City Council has taken a toll on Donna Frye, and she is not the kind of person that takes that job lightly. She puts a lot of work into it, and she for years was beaten down as kind of the person who always said no to everything and was always on the wrong end of a 7-1 vote. And, you know, she’s been bogged down by pension issues and that’s not her passion. She did tell be before she made her decision that she was afraid that she was going to get bogged down in pension issues at the county as well.

PENNER: Ok. Well now, Kent, all the county supervisors are white and Republican. And her decision not to run could cement in a conservative board for the indefinite future. Is that a good thing? A bad thing? What?

DAVY: Well I don't know god thing or bad thing. It certainly does cement in a Republican board. I think it’s important to remember most people simply don’t care much about the Board of Supervisors. The county in fiscal terms is run fairly well. And the people where the rough spots with county government are, say, in the provision of food stamps. Those go to people who don’t tend to vote and don’t tend to participate. Or they spend a lot of time dealing with backcountry issues. Bill, Supervisor of parts of the backcountry, has a big political base underneath him and a more conservative elect.

PENNER: Just getting back to the race for Supervisor – a big Democratic registration in that district. Labor hasn’t had a voice on the County Board of Supervisors for years. Do you expect labor is going to mount a candidate in the week that’s left until the filing deadline?

ROLLAND: No I don’t. They're no going to. They're focused on passing a term limits ballot measure in hopes of shaking up the board that way. The power of incumbency at the County Board of Supervisors is very powerful.

Comments

Avatar for user 'hannahcohen'

hannahcohen | March 5, 2010 at 5:36 p.m. ― 4 years, 9 months ago

Here are some suggestions about changing Megans Law.When sex offenders are registering their residence also include both mother and father's address must be disclosed.Since most people visit parents.it should be disclosed what city they work. Sex offenders should be required to wear GPS tracking for life. They should be fined yearly fee to maintain the device so that so tax payers don't pay for it. If you are a registered sex offender and you live in the county of san diego you will have to pay a 250 dollars a year as a special assessment for cover expenses to up keep their data. if a sex offender offends and at the time is living elsewhere other than the registered addresses, if he is living in someone's home, the people who live their will also be charged as accessories and harboring a fugitive. this will help cut down on people who help sex offenders "hide." make a anonymous hotline for people to report sex offenders who are not living where they are supposed to be living. to help cut down on sex offenders hiding.also it should be disclosed in what city they work in. also becuase we live close to the border, any illegal who is charged with a crime against a child should be deported immediatly and any welfare and governemnt aid should stop immediatly. also anyone who commits a crime against a child loses their driving license privledges for two years.also we need more safety training for children. a yearly seminar every year in every school about the dangers to talking to strangers, how to protect themselves. post megan laws local offenders photos in schools. also start mother carpools and have some incentive to do a mothers carpool to help have less children walking to and from school.please help to change the laws to better protect our children.we owe it to our children. lets make san diego county the most unfriendliest place for sex offenders to live in. thank you

( | suggest removal )

Avatar for user 'MSLGWCEO'

MSLGWCEO | March 6, 2010 at 8:21 a.m. ― 4 years, 9 months ago

Write all the laws you want. They will not prevent anyone from committing a crime, if they are determined to do so. In fact, the harsh laws encourage the killing of a victim, because dead people cannot testify. Unless there is some kind of evidence to direct investigators to the Perp. So, how do you tell who might be dangerous? While nothing is 100 percent in this world, we must concentrate on the most dangerous.

1. The VIOLENT offender.

2. The REPEAT offender.

3. The offender who DID NOT KNOW their victim.

If you notice. The vast majority of these most heinous sexual assaults, fall into 1 or all three categories. We are wasting all the resources on the low to no risk while the predators are hiding in the registry.

This is so simple and so to the point! When people say, "Well, we can't get rid of the register, what do you think we should do?" Answer, if we need a public register at all, and I truly don't think the public has proven that they can handle it, then the only ones on it should be those that fell into the categories above!

( | suggest removal )