Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Available On Air Stations
Watch Live

Environment

San Diego County Water Authority Takes Rates Dispute To State Supreme Court

The San Diego County Water Authority has been upgrading its existing water storage facilities in an effort to decrease reliance on the Metropolitan Water Authority. This photo shows construction at the San Vicente Dam to remove the right crest of the dam to increase the size of the reservoir, November 2009.
San Diego County Water Authority
The San Diego County Water Authority has been upgrading its existing water storage facilities in an effort to decrease reliance on the Metropolitan Water Authority. This photo shows construction at the San Vicente Dam to remove the right crest of the dam to increase the size of the reservoir, November 2009.

The San Diego County Water Authority (SDCWA) announced Monday it will take a long-running legal dispute over rates to the state Supreme Court.

The decision comes just over a month after an appellate court issued what amounted to a split decision in the Water Authority's case against the Metropolitan Water District (MWD) of Southern California.

The SDCWA has sued the MWD multiple times over rates, with the largest issue being how much the MWD was allowed to charge for transporting Colorado River water to San Diego. The MWD is the primary water wholesaler in the southern half of the state and owns the facilities that convey water around the region.

Advertisement

A San Francisco Superior Court judge has consistently ruled in favor of the San Diego water agency, which has been awarded a total of roughly $232 million. The MWD appealed, and among other things, the appellate justices ordered the damages to be recalculated.

RELATED: San Diego Water Rate Dispute Continues, Expected To Go To California Supreme Court

The San Diego water agency contended it was not only billed for moving the water from one place to another, but also for the MWD's costs of maintaining the California Aqueduct — a system not used for bringing the Colorado River water to San Diego.

"While components of this case appear complex, it essentially boils down to whether MWD can force San Diego County to pay for a State Water Project supply it didn't want to buy and hasn't received," said Mark Muir, chairman of the Water Authority's Board of Directors.

"We are hopeful that the state's highest court will recognize that the Water Authority's Board of Directors did the right thing when it chose to invest billions of dollars to conserve water in Imperial County, rather than continue its heavy reliance on imported water supplies purchased from MWD, a substantial portion of which MWD obtains from the Bay-Delta," Muir said. "We also hope the Supreme Court will grant review in order to preserve bedrock limits on the power of government to impose fees and charges on ordinary Californians."

Advertisement

Lawyer Neal Katyal said the impact of the appellate court ruling will be felt statewide if not reversed by the high court.

MWD officials contend the Water Authority is trying to shift its cost onto ratepayers elsewhere in the state.

The Supreme Court justices have about two months to decide whether to accept the case. If they do, it could take 18 months to two years before a final decision is issued.