China's government has had a rough summer. Officials have tried and failed to stop the country's stock markets from nosediving. Both the Shenzhen and Shanghai exchanges closed down again today.
Earlier this month, the government announced a surprise devaluation that rattled global markets.
Economists see these as odd, unforced errors by a government that built its reputation on shrewd economic management.
The picture appears even worse when you consider the recent Tianjin disaster, where it was revealed that local corruption led to chemical explosions that killed more than 100 people.
All this has some analysts wondering: Is China's Communist Party losing some of its touch?
Outside a stock trading hall in the heart of Shanghai, people are trickling in for the afternoon session to see where stocks are.
Chen, a retired laborer who used to work in a watch factory, has been looking at the market closely. One of his criticisms is that state and commercial media have encouraged people to keep investing in the market and actually helped create the bubble.
"This is the product of an economy where officials and businessmen collude," says Chen, who doesn't want to use his full name because he's discussing something politically sensitive and criticizing the government. "Those editorials are just ripping people off. Those big capitalists use the mainstream media to confuse ignorant people and get them into the market and to rob the society of its wealth."
Harsh words. But economists are almost equally blunt these days.
"In the stock market case, I think the government was really incompetent on several levels because they were actively promoting something that was really bad economically," says Arthur Kroeber, the head of research at Gavekal Dragonomics, a Beijing-based economics research firm.
Why would officials do this?
Fraser Howie, an author who's spent nearly 25 years studying Chinese markets, says the government pumped up stocks in hopes of boosting China's economy, where growth is slowing.
"I think what the government was trying to do — which I think was stupid — but I think what the potential rationale was, [they] were hoping for a wealth effect through the stock market, and that can ignite a growth story as well."
Kroeber says when stocks went south, the government lost its way.
"They first encouraged an irrational bubble," he says. "Then they tried, unreasonably, to protect the market from the consequences of its own excesses. And then, having done that for two months, they kind of gave up."
When the government devalued China's currency earlier this month, its performance was no better.
Officials didn't immediately spell out their motives — sparking fears that China's economy was in worse shape than it appeared.
"What they should have done is said, 'Here's why we're devaluing the currency, here's why we're only doing it a small amount,' " says Andy Rothman, an investment strategist for Matthews Asia, a San Francisco-based firm that focuses exclusively on Asia. "And that would have put people at ease, rather than having the resulting chaos in stock markets around the world."
And then there were this month's explosions in the port city of Tianjin.
David Bandurski, a researcher at the China Media Project at the University of Hong Kong, followed the government's response to the blasts that killed more than 100 and left more than 700 injured.
He says officials tried to censor information and craft a narrative that focused on heroic first responders. But citizens began asking questions online, and commercial media exposed government malfeasance that contributed to the disaster.
Bandurski says the government just couldn't catch up.
"The authorities, in this case, completely lost the story," he says. "There was no way they could impose a larger narrative on it."
Why has the government made missteps this summer and struggled to manage its message?
For one thing, it's harder and harder to control information in the information age — even in authoritarian China.
But there is another reason, Kroeber says: Government officials are at odds on how to handle the economy and slowing growth.
"There is very clearly a deep division within the government about how much structural economic reform needs to be done, and this is not a debate that has been clearly decided from one side or the other," he says. "So when you look at it from the outside, it looks like confusion."
Copyright 2015 NPR. To see more, visit http://www.npr.org/.
