California Is Overriding Its Limits On Nurse Workloads As COVID-19 Surges
California's telemetry nurses, who specialize in the electronic monitoring of critically ill patients, normally take care of four patients at once. But ever since the state relaxed California's mandatory nurse-to-patient ratios in mid-December, Nerissa Black has had to keep track of six.
And these six patients are really sick: they all need constant electronic heart monitoring and many of them are being treated simultaneously for a stroke and COVID-19, or a heart attack and COVID-19. With more patients than usual needing more complex care, Black says she's worried she'll miss something or make a mistake.
"We are given 50% more patients and we're expected to do 50% more things with the same amount of time," says Black, who has worked at the Henry Mayo Newhall Hospital in Valencia, Calif., for the past seven years. "I go home and I feel like I could have done more. I don't feel like I'm giving the care to my patients like a human being deserves."
As COVID-19 patients continue to flood California emergency rooms, hospitals are increasingly desperate to find enough staff to care for all them. The state is asking nurses to take care of more patients simultaneously than they normally would, watering down what many nurses and their unions consider their most sacrosanct job protection: a law existing only in California that puts legal restrictions on the nurse-to-patient ratio.
"We need to temporarily — very short-term, temporarily — look a little bit differently in terms of our staffing needs," said Gov. Gavin Newsom, after he quietly allowed hospitals to adjust their nurse-to-patient ratios on Dec. 11. Normally, California law requires a hospital to first get approval from the state before tinkering with those ratios; Newsom's move gave hospitals presumptive approval to work outside the ratio rules immediately.
Since then, 170 hospitals, mainly in Southern California, have been operating under the new pandemic ratios: They can require ICU nurses to care for three patients instead of two. Emergency room and telemetry nurses may now be asked to care for six patients instead of four. Medical-surgical nurses are looking after seven patients instead of five.
Nurses have taken to the streets in protest, holding socially distanced demonstrations across the state, shouting and carrying posters that read: "Ratios Save Lives." The union, the California Nurses Association, says the staffing shortage is a result of bad hospital management, of taking a reactive approach to staffing rather than proactive: laying nurses off over the summer, then not hiring or training enough for winter.
"What we're seeing in these hospitals is their just-in-time response to a pandemic that they never prepared for: just-in-time staffing, just-in-time resources, not staffing up, calling nurses in on a shift at the very last minute — to boost profits," says Stephanie Roberson, the government relations director for the California Nurses Association. "And we're seeing how nurses are being stretched even thinner."
But hospitals say this is an unprecedented crisis that has spiraled beyond their control. In the current surge, four times as many Californians are testing positive for the coronavirus compared to the summer peak. As many as 7,000 new patients could soon be coming to California hospitals every day, according to Carmela Coyle, who heads the California Hospital Association.
"This is catastrophic and we cannot dodge this math," she says. "We are simply out of nurses, out of doctors, out of respiratory therapists."
The state has asked the federal government for staff, including 200 medical personnel from the U.S. Department of Defense, and it's tried to reactivate the California Health Corps, an initiative to recruit retired health workers to come back to work, but that has yielded few people with the qualifications needed to care for hospitalized COVID-19 patients.
Hiring contract nurses from temporary staffing agencies or other states is all but impossible right now, Coyle says.
"Because California surged early during the summer and other parts of the United States then surged afterward," she says, "those travel nurses are taken."
Hospitals' next step is to try "team nursing," Coyle says, pulling nurses from other departments, like the operating room, for example, and partnering them with experienced critical care nurses to help care for COVID-19 patients.
Joanne Spetz is an economics professor who studies health care workforce issues at the University of California, San Francisco. She says hospitals should have started training nurses for team care over the summer, in anticipation of a winter surge, but they didn't, either because of costs — hospitals lost a lot of revenue from canceled elective surgeries that could have paid for that training — or because of excessive optimism.
"California was doing so well," she says. "It was easy for all of us to believe that we kind of got it under control, and I think there was a lot of belief that we would be able to maintain that."
The California Nurses Association has good reason to be defensive when it comes to the integrity of the patient ratio law, Spetz says. It took 10 years of lobbying and activism before the bill passed the state legislature in 1999, then several more years to overcome multiple court challenges, including one from then-Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger.
"I'm always kicking their butt, that's why they don't like me," Schwarzenegger famously said of nurses, drawing broad ire from the nurse's union and its allies.
Nurses prevailed in the court of public opinion and in law; rules that put a legal cap on the number of patients per nurse finally took effect in 2004. But the long battle has made nurses fiercely protective of their win. They've even accused hospitals of using the pandemic to try to roll back ratios for good.
"This is the exercise of disaster capitalism at its finest, where [hospital administrators] are completely maximizing their opportunity to take advantage of this crisis," says Roberson.
Hospitals deny they want to change the ratio law permanently, and Spetz says it's unlikely that they'd succeed if they tried.
The public can see that nurses are overworked and burned out by the pandemic, she adds, so there would be little support for cutting back their job protections once it's over.
"To go in and say, 'Oh, you clearly did so well without ratios when we let you waive them, so let's just eliminate them entirely,' I think, would be just adding insult to moral injury," Spetz says.
Copyright 2020 KQED. To see more, visit KQED.