Skip to main content

San Diego County Board Of Supervisors OKs Temporary Migrant Shelter

Members of the Rapid Response Network and of the public watch a San Diego Cou...

Photo by Matthew Bowler

Above: Members of the Rapid Response Network and of the public watch a San Diego County Board of Supervisors meeting on housing asylum seekers, Jan. 29, 2019.

After a lengthy public hearing, county supervisors Tuesday signed off on a plan to temporarily house migrants at a San Diego property.

On a 4-1 vote, the board approved a lease agreement with Jewish Family Service of San Diego for the property, an unused courthouse slated to be demolished. The lease term will end Dec. 31.

Supervisor Jim Desmond cast the dissenting vote, citing health care-related costs.

Many in the meeting hall gallery applauded the board's decision, which Chairwoman Dianne Jacob described as "the right thing to do."

Jewish Family Service of San Diego will make a one-time lease payment of $1 to the county and will reimburse it for all costs to open and maintain the property.

Jewish Family Service will pay for all ongoing operation and maintenance costs, according to the county.

The San Diego Rapid Response Network, a coalition of human rights, service and faith-based organizations, have offered humanitarian aid and assistance to asylum-seeking migrants for months, including members of the Central American migrant caravans that arrived in Tijuana in November. The coalition says it has helped more than 5,200 migrants since early November.

The coalition's lease on its current location is set to run out on Feb. 15, prompting the board's vote. Coalition members contended that hundreds of asylum-seekers would be rendered homeless should the shelter facility's doors shutter without a new location.

RELATED: Asylum Seekers Find It’s Catch And Can’t Release Fast Enough

According to JFS, a member organization of the Rapid Response Network, funding for the shelter has already been secured, lifting the financial burden off the county's shoulders.

Supervisor Nathan Fletcher, one of the main proponents, said a shelter is the "most workable solution."

Fletcher said the federal government has failed in properly dealing with the influx of those seeking asylum, but the county will inherit the crisis if it doesn't step up.

"If we have to scour around every bus station to help people, it will cost us more," Fletcher added.

Officials from both the county District Attorney's and Sheriff's offices have written letters supporting the temporary shelter as a way to protect vulnerable migrants from traffickers and prevent any major health crisis.

RELATED: San Diego Migrant Shelter Nurse Says ‘System Is Overwhelmed’

The board also heard from representatives of San Diego Mayor Kevin Faulconer and Assemblyman Todd Gloria, who also support the shelter.

"That means eight full-time, on-site medical professionals,'' Desmond said. "If these same services are carried out in the new shelter, that will cost $4 million between now and December."

The federal government and state should also cover health costs, Desmond said.

He also faulted a recently established migrant crisis task force for not yet holding a formal meeting.

"I'm OK with the shelter, but not with the county having to bear the entire burden," Desmond said.

Before the vote, numerous people, many of them activists, urged the board to approve the temporary shelter.

Johanna Afshani, a Solana Beach resident and attorney, said she believes it's her moral responsibility to open her heart to refugees.

"I am simply here to give a voice to the voiceless," Afshani said. "I don't want my kids 20 years from now asking me, 'Why didn't you help these children?'"

A man opposed to the shelter had another view. Roger Ogden said one main reason the migrants are traveling to San Diego "is because you give the goodies to them."

The San Diego resident said the idea that the county isn't aiding the caravans is "baloney."

He contended that many migrants who are allowed to stay in the U.S. do not attend their court hearings. Ogden also said many also have no legitimate claim to asylum.

After the meeting, Fletcher said he was "just happy (the motion) passed. The issue of immigration will continue, but "this gives us time and space to figure out a sustainable solution," Fletcher added.

Want more KPBS news?
Find us on Twitter and Facebook, or sign up for our newsletters.

To view PDF documents, Download Acrobat Reader.